“…As per the S–Q limit model, the theoretical PCE in single junction PSCs is ∼33%; however, at the experimental level, there are several factors responsible for efficiency loss in OIHPSCs. , Additionally, the morphologies of the OIHP and transport layers play crucial roles in the PSC performance. − The morphology of photo-absorbers is generally related to the light-harvesting and charge carrier generation in PSCs. For boosting PCE in PSCs, there has been broad research going on to fabricate controlled perovskite films with uniformity through solution processing that includes solvent vapor annealing, sequential depositions, and solvent engineering. ,,− In conventional PSCs, the photo-absorber is sandwiched between the electron transport layer (ETL) and hole transport layer (HTL), where TiO 2 typically is employed as an ETL; however, the high temperature processing for its crystallization and sintering could increase the overall production cost and hence the commercialization. , To overcome this issue, an inverted p-i-n PSC structure has been developed and under extensive research, where organic ETLs such as PCBM are exploited, help in minimizing the density of defects in the perovskite/ETL interface, deliver a well-matched alignment of band structures, and so on. − Nevertheless, PSCs without ETL generally face substantial reduction in V oc , J sc , and FF and affect the overall device performance. − It is worth mentioning that the morphology of ETL and interactions between multiple interfaces within the device are very crucial for efficient charge transport and collection processes; ,, however, focused investigations on ETL morphology studies in PSCs are limited. There are few systematic studies that have been pursued on different mono-solvent systems followed with the prolonged solvent annealing process of ETL for complete evaporation of the solvent and better perovskite/ETL interfacing, resulting in controlled film quality with respectable efficiency. ,, Liu and Lee investigated the effect of 1,8-diiodooctane (DIO) as a solvent additive to control the PCBM-ETL morphology with an annealing temperature of 40 °C for 30 min in an inverted PSC architecture, achieving a PCE of 14.8%.…”