2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/700/2/1349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary Orbit, Physical Properties, and Evolutionary State of Capella (Α Aurigae)

Abstract: We report extensive radial-velocity measurements of the two giant components of the detached, 104day period binary system of Capella. Our highly accurate three-dimensional orbital solution based on all existing spectroscopic and astrometric observations including our own yields much improved masses for the primary and secondary of 2.466 ± 0.018 M ⊙ and 2.443 ± 0.013 M ⊙ , with relative errors of only 0.7% and 0.5%, respectively. The mass ratio is considerably closer to unity than previously believed, which has… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
(263 reference statements)
7
66
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard error in an observation of unit weight was 73 m s −1 , which is the best so far achieved for an orbit of a chromospherically active star (e.g. Fekel et al 1999;Griffin 2009;Torres et al 2009). However, this rms includes the modulation due to the asynchronously rotating spotted surface.…”
Section: Orbital Elementsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The standard error in an observation of unit weight was 73 m s −1 , which is the best so far achieved for an orbit of a chromospherically active star (e.g. Fekel et al 1999;Griffin 2009;Torres et al 2009). However, this rms includes the modulation due to the asynchronously rotating spotted surface.…”
Section: Orbital Elementsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…1) seems to fit the observations very well, but there are inconsistencies in the latter. Two recent published measurements of K2 (the RV amplitude of the secondary) appear quite precise according to their respective internal standard deviations, but the values differ from one other by many σ: K2 = 26.27 ± 0.09 (Torres et al 2009), or 26.840±0.024 (Weber & Strassmeier 2011), equivalent to differences of 6 σ or 24 σ, respectively. In fact our models for Capella fit much better the values of Weber & Strassmeier.…”
Section: Adopted Principles For Selecting and Modelling The Samplementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Torres et al 2009;Zwahlen et al 2004). This method provides a direct geometric distance and model-independent masses, and does not require any assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%