1969
DOI: 10.2307/842985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binary Variants of Early Classic Sonata Form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…353–87, call ‘Type 2’ sonatas, since their recapitulations all begin with thematic material stated at the outset of their expositions. By the same token, sonatas with dominant‐governed developments might qualify as what Prout () – and then Longyear () – dubbed ‘abridged’ sonata form, though not what Longyear () called ‘binary’ sonata form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…353–87, call ‘Type 2’ sonatas, since their recapitulations all begin with thematic material stated at the outset of their expositions. By the same token, sonatas with dominant‐governed developments might qualify as what Prout () – and then Longyear () – dubbed ‘abridged’ sonata form, though not what Longyear () called ‘binary’ sonata form.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Rosen never states outright that the late cadence in vi originates from the binary, the aria or the concerto, he argues that the sonatas of the mid‐ to late‐eighteenth century are outgrowths or close relatives of these other forms. Moreover, the evolution of sonata form from binary form has been well documented (Kirkpatrick , p. 251–79), as have many ‘binary variants’ of the sonata that were prevalent around 1740–80 (Longyear ). Some of these binary variants are subsumed by Hepokoski and Darcy's () Type 2 sonata category.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%