Binding Energy of Ar2+ from Ion Scattering Data

Characterization of Homonuclear Diatomic Ions by Semiempirical Morse Potential Energy Curves. 2. The Rare Gas Positive Ions

“…In Table , the experimental Morse parameters for all of the states of the diatomic ions are summarized, with the most recent values from each experimental procedure shown. ,,,,− The values for D 0 , r e , and ν e resulting from the combined data which was used to construct the Morse curves presented herein appear in the first column for each parameter in Tables and so that they can easily be compared with the literature values. The values appearing in the second column of Table for D 0 and ν e are those that we have been obtained from the published high-resolution spectra.…”

“…The values appearing in the second column of Table for D 0 and ν e are those that we have been obtained from the published high-resolution spectra. Selected theoretically calculated values of the Morse parameters are given in Table . ,,− ,− Table presents the auxiliary data that were also considered in constructing the curves. − ,− Atomic radii determined from the literature and from these studies are given in Table . − …”

“…6,12,[16][17][18][19][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] Table 3 presents the auxiliary data that were also considered in constructing the curves. [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] Atomic radii determined from the literature and from these studies are given in Table 4. [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89] The experimental values of bond dissociation energies for all the Rg 2 + ions were summarized by Mulliken in 1970.…”

Elastic Differential Scattering ofHe+Ions by Ne and Ar and ofAr+Aberth1, Lorents2 1966Phys. Rev.710130View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…This gives a value for the Ar 2 + well depth of 1.6±0.3 eV. Cloney, Mason, and Vanderslice 19 have calculated the Ar 2 + binding energy based on the total cross-section data of Ghosh and Sheridan 20 and Cramer. 21 Their value of 0.056 eV is inconsistent with our results and may be due to their considering only the 2 2 w and 2 2 ff electronic states of Ar 2 + .…”