2013
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/25/33/335802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding energy of hydrogenic impurities in quantum dots under intense laser radiation

Abstract: Abstract.We calculate the binding energy of on-and off-center hydrogenic impurities in a parabolic quantum dot subjected to an intense high-frequency laser field. An exactly solvable model is introduced for calculating the binding energy that replaces the actual Coulomb interaction with the donor by a nonlocal separable potential. The separable potential allows us to solve exactly the problem and all calculations are carried out analytically. The action of the laser irradiation results in dressed Coulomb and c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, we only retain the term K = 0 in the expansion (32). Therefore (30) Using the closure relation (31) we get…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this way, we only retain the term K = 0 in the expansion (32). Therefore (30) Using the closure relation (31) we get…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis and conclusions can be trivially extended to any 2D material where electron dynamics can be described by the massless Dirac equation. The interaction of the electron with the scatterers is accounted for by a separable pseudo-potential model [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] . In spite of its seemingly more complicated form, the separable pseudo-potential model is amenable to analytical solution and allows us to obtain closed expressions for the average Green's function within the SCBA and CPA frameworks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, one can test different shape functions until the desired accuracy of the results is obtained. Typically naive functions with very few adjustable parameters are good candidates [37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: B Green's Function Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space‐translated version of the Schrödinger equation describing the interaction dynamics, performed by Kramers–Henneberger unitary translational transformation , is as follows: 22m*2z2+V(boldz+boldα(t))+|e|Fz-0.16667emϕfalse(z,tfalse)=itϕfalse(z,tfalse).Here, m* is the effective electron mass, false|efalse| is the absolute value of the electron charge, z is the space coordinate along the growth direction of quantum well, and F is strength of the static electric field parallel to z ‐direction. Vfalse(zfalse) is the confinement potential energy where αfalse(tfalse)=α0sin(Ωt)zˆ;1emα0=eA0/m*Ω represents the motion of an electron in a linearly polarized monochromatic laser field and α0 is the laser‐dressing parameter that defines the amplitude of the electron oscillation in the laser field (called also as quiver amplitude) . In Eq.…”
Section: Theory and Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…represents the motion of an electron in a linearly polarized monochromatic laser field and α 0 is the laser-dressing parameter that defines the amplitude of the electron oscillation in the laser field (called also as quiver amplitude) [30]. In Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%