1995
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199560120-00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of Activated Protein C to a Specific Receptor on Human Mononuclear Phagocytes Inhibits Intracellular Calcium Signaling and Monocyte-Dependent Proliferative Responses1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Expression profiling of EPCR + DCs and the entire CD11c hi DC population indeed revealed a remarkably complex effect of aPC treatment that was neither limited to EPCR + DCs nor strictly dependent on normal expression levels of PAR1 and EPCR and exhibited a markedly biphasic pattern. Such findings are entirely consistent with the notion that aPC not only engages the EPCR/PAR1 axis but interacts in addition with other signalingcompetent receptors, including apoE receptor-2 (apoER2/lrp8), glycoprotein 1bα (GP1bα) (54,55), CD11b/Mac-1 (F.J. Castellino, unpublished observation), and possibly as-yet-unknown aPC-selective receptors on monocytes (56). Integration of the dataset provided in Supplemental Excel file 1 with data from corresponding expression studies on mice lacking the various candidate receptors for aPC in specific cell types should eventually enable a systematic dissection of the specific intra- and intercellular pathways regulated by aPC over the time course of endotoxemia and infection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Expression profiling of EPCR + DCs and the entire CD11c hi DC population indeed revealed a remarkably complex effect of aPC treatment that was neither limited to EPCR + DCs nor strictly dependent on normal expression levels of PAR1 and EPCR and exhibited a markedly biphasic pattern. Such findings are entirely consistent with the notion that aPC not only engages the EPCR/PAR1 axis but interacts in addition with other signalingcompetent receptors, including apoE receptor-2 (apoER2/lrp8), glycoprotein 1bα (GP1bα) (54,55), CD11b/Mac-1 (F.J. Castellino, unpublished observation), and possibly as-yet-unknown aPC-selective receptors on monocytes (56). Integration of the dataset provided in Supplemental Excel file 1 with data from corresponding expression studies on mice lacking the various candidate receptors for aPC in specific cell types should eventually enable a systematic dissection of the specific intra- and intercellular pathways regulated by aPC over the time course of endotoxemia and infection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, PC has also been regarded as a link between coagulation and inflammation, 17 because uncontrolled coagulation results in thrombosis, as well as promotion of cellular proliferation and an inflammatory response. 18 Although increased neutrophil infiltration was observed in PC Ϫ/Ϫ E18.5dpc embryos, an inflammatory-related cause of death was not thoroughly explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have shown that blocking the binding of activated protein C to EPCR did not affect the inhibition of TNF-␣ production by activated protein C in LPS-stimulated human monocytes (11). It is also possible that there may be an alternative activated protein C-binding receptor on the surface of monocytes (51). Using Ca 2ϩ -free conditions (which prevents activated protein C-EPCR interactions) (52) or mAbs that block activated protein C-EPCR interactions (53), we observed that recombinant activated protein C retained the ability to bind to the monocyte cell surface (unpublished observations).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 96%