2013
DOI: 10.4161/pri.25148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of bovine T194A PrPCby PrPSc-specific antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of the antibodies generated in response to the vaccine to discriminate subtle structural differences between mutant and wild-type proteins, 25 suggests that care may be necessary in applying this vaccination approach to disease susceptible individuals. While tga20 mice expressing wild-type PrP do not show any clinical signs of disease, would mice overexpressing a disease-specific mutant respond differently?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability of the antibodies generated in response to the vaccine to discriminate subtle structural differences between mutant and wild-type proteins, 25 suggests that care may be necessary in applying this vaccination approach to disease susceptible individuals. While tga20 mice expressing wild-type PrP do not show any clinical signs of disease, would mice overexpressing a disease-specific mutant respond differently?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a single molecule binding technique and immunoprecipitations, we recently discovered that PrP Sc -specific antibodies generated against the expanded YYR epitope (SN6b) bind to the bovine equivalent of human T183A prion protein associated with a rare form of early onset familial dementia. 25 Thus, the PrP Sc -specific polyclonal antibodies generated in response to the vaccine can recognize subtle conformational differences and may interact with partially folded PrP. While such interactions are unlikely to elicit a misfolding event, the process of template-directed misfolding remains poorly understood, and any therapeutic approach that involves binding of PrP and potential perturbation of its structure, should be carefully tested for safety in vivo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach to target the PrP Sc template and at the same time avoid the recognition of abundantly expressed PrP c , guided the development of the vaccine based on the PrP Sc dominant epitope YYR [ 40 ]. The follow up studies were focused to (i) exclude the concern that such anti-PrP Sc antibodies might by themselves induce the formation of the PrP Sc template and to (ii) drive the anti-PrP antibody response towards conformations of PrP mutants associated with genetic types of the disease [ 76 ]. The animal studies show that still mucosal vaccination seems to be the most effective, although this approach would be restricted to preventing oral transmission among animals and human populations at risk [ 77 , 78 ].…”
Section: Active and Passive Immunotherapy Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incubation of the T194A mutant with the ovine DSE antibodies failed to generate protease resistant species indicating the probability of antibodies inducing misfolding is minimal, even with a substrate with greater structural propensity for misfolding. 64 In vivo template directed misfolding While the inability of the DSE-specific antibodies to promote in vitro misfolding of PrP C is reassuring, it is important to appreciate that such experiments do not replicate the in vivo environment. Therefore, we inquired whether DSE-based vaccines were capable of antibody-induced misfolding of PrP C in sheep.…”
Section: Safety Of Induced Immune Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%