2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of intrinsically disordered proteins is not necessarily accompanied by a structural transition to a folded form

Abstract: There are a large number of protein domains and even entire proteins, lacking ordered structure under physiological conditions. Intriguingly, a highly flexible, random coil-like conformation is the native and functional state for many proteins known to be involved in cell signaling. An example is a key component of immune signaling, the cytoplasmic region of the T cell receptor ζ subunit. This domain exhibits specific dimerization that is distinct from non-specific aggregation behavior seen in many systems. In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
137
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
137
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that the monomeric forms of UmuD and UmuDЈ, if they are ever present in solution, would be disordered and may undergo some disorder-to-order transition upon homodimerization (44). However, recent data show that a disorder-to-order transition is not necessary for homodimerization of one IDP, the T cell receptor -subunit (46). UmuD 2 and UmuDЈ 2 share homology with the dimerization domains of certain bacterial transcription factors (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These results suggest that the monomeric forms of UmuD and UmuDЈ, if they are ever present in solution, would be disordered and may undergo some disorder-to-order transition upon homodimerization (44). However, recent data show that a disorder-to-order transition is not necessary for homodimerization of one IDP, the T cell receptor -subunit (46). UmuD 2 and UmuDЈ 2 share homology with the dimerization domains of certain bacterial transcription factors (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Anhydrin must bind DNA to effect its function, and NMR and slot-blot experiments confirm this, but CD and FTIR spectroscopy show that the protein does not thereby gain recognized secondary structure. This does not exclude the adoption of a specific spatial orientation with respect to its substrate but means that the polypeptide chain must remain extended in contact with DNA; a few other cases of IDPs remaining entirely disordered in the bound state are known (35,36). A nuclease function for anhydrin would be of value in anhydrobiosis where desiccation is expected to cause DNA breakage, tangling, and stalled replication forks, resulting in structures that require resolution, repair, or removal during the rehydration phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an interaction of an IDP/IDPR with its binding partner is often accompanied by a disorder-to-order transition resulting in a (partial) folding of an IDP (9, 38, 50, 53, 54, 56 -59), many IDPs/IDPRs form fuzzy complexes in which they remain predominantly disordered, at least outside the binding interface (61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68). Similar to the disordered regions of unbound IDPs, these under-folded, fuzzy regions of bound IDPs/IDPRs have multiple functions, e.g.…”
Section: Binding-induced Under-folding: Fuzziness Of Disorder-based Cmentioning
confidence: 99%