1985
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9797(85)90408-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of sodium ion to alkylsulfate micelles in the presence of electrolytes: Electromotive force measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a plot ( Fig. 2) presents two different linear parts that are already described in the literature (16). For concentration below the CMC, the surfactant salt behaves like a strong electrolyte and the response of the electrode is nernstian (the slope of the EMF versus the logarithm of the total amount of surfactant varies between 57 and 60 mV per decade).…”
Section: (A) Emf Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such a plot ( Fig. 2) presents two different linear parts that are already described in the literature (16). For concentration below the CMC, the surfactant salt behaves like a strong electrolyte and the response of the electrode is nernstian (the slope of the EMF versus the logarithm of the total amount of surfactant varies between 57 and 60 mV per decade).…”
Section: (A) Emf Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is also to be underlined that relations [17] do not bring new information because they come from the same origin as equation [16]. Second case: solubility equilibrium of a salt AX.…”
Section: (B) a New Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming that the Debye-Hückel theory can be applied to calculate the y Mic value, and that a i has the same value for all species [2], Eq. (12) can be rewritten as (14) ln…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference between the two models is the concentration dependence of monomer activity (a x ) at surfactant concentrations (c t ) higher than the critical micelle concentration (cmc): according to PSM, a x should stay constant for c t > cmc, while MAM, as proved by potentiometric measurements [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], predicts an increase of a x even above cmc until it reaches maximum (at c t not much higher than cmc) and then it starts to decrease. Concentration dependence of species activities in the surfactant solution is of great importance, since by knowing it one can calculate concentrations of species required for determination of the aggregation number (N ) and the counterion binding parameter (α).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%