1988
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(88)80282-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of specific ligands to muscarinic receptors alters the fluidity of membrane fragments from rat brain A fluorescence polarization study with lipid‐specific probes

Abstract: The previously suggested method of following ligand-receptor interactions by measuring ligand-induced changes in membrane fluidity [(1986) FEBS Lett. 194, 313-316] was employed to study the binding of specific ligands of the muscarinic receptor to rat brain membrane fragments containing a fluorescent analogue of phosphatidylcholine (APC) as a membrane probe. Upon addition of carbachol and atropine in low concentrations the fluorescence polarization of the APC-labeled membranes decreased significantly demonstra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same manner fluidity changes of the lipid environment were detected after addition of specific muscarinic ligands to rat brain membrane fragments (Fig. 3) [12] prelabeled with APC. In these experiments the muscarinic agonist, carbachol, and the antagonist, atropine, appeared to compete for the same receptor; however, the maximal effect of atropine was considerably smaller.…”
Section: R B Molecules/cellssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the same manner fluidity changes of the lipid environment were detected after addition of specific muscarinic ligands to rat brain membrane fragments (Fig. 3) [12] prelabeled with APC. In these experiments the muscarinic agonist, carbachol, and the antagonist, atropine, appeared to compete for the same receptor; however, the maximal effect of atropine was considerably smaller.…”
Section: R B Molecules/cellssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…3) [12] prelabeled with APC. In these experiments the muscarinic agonist, carbachol, and the antagonist, atropine, appeared to compete for the same receptor; however, the maximal effect of atropine was considerably smaller.…”
Section: R B Molecules/cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting Figure S7 shows that NOE(−3.5) may arise from both proteins and methylene protons of membrane phospholipids, while NOE(−1.6) may arise from the phospholipid choline head groups that have a resonance frequency at around −1.6 ppm. The NOE(−1.6) coupling rate may depend on the choline head group mobility, which may be regulated by the phospholipid head group conformation and charge, membrane component, and insertion of small amphiphilic molecules into lipid bilayers . The NOE(−1.6) effect may also be relayed between successive protons through multiple‐step spin diffusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NOE(−1.6) coupling rate may depend on the choline head group mobility, which may be regulated by the phospholipid head group conformation and charge, 66,67 membrane component, and insertion of small amphiphilic molecules into lipid bilayers. [68][69][70][71][72][73] The NOE(−1.6) effect may also be relayed between successive protons through multiple-step spin diffusion. A further evaluation of the mechanism for the variation of the NOE(−1.6) coupling rate in tumors is warranted, because it may represent a new biomarker of pathologies and physiologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ethanol specifically and selectively affects the function of the GABA-coupled chloride channel [54,55]. Still, a large, diverse collection of physiological agonists produces the alterations in membrane fluidity as well as specific ligand-receptor interaction [56]. Hence the function of membrane proteins may be modulated secondarily to changes in membrane fluidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%