1976
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600650333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of Sulfisoxazole to Protein Fractions of Tears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistically insignificant differences between the uptake of the drug [P-HCl 0.01% (0.6 mM) and P-HCl 0.01% (0.6 mM) / CD] were determined in the case of lower concentrated CD solutions [R-CD 0.5% (4.8 mM), HE--CD 0.74% (4.8 mM); Figure 2], whereas higher concentrated CD solutions [R-CD, 8.54% (82 mM), HE--CD 12.01% (82 mM)] seemed to have a statistically significant influence on the uptake of the drug [P-HCl 2% (82 mM)] into porcine cornea (p < 0.05). As far as R-CD-containing solutions are concerned, a marked increase of P-HCl absorbed by the tissue was determined (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statistically insignificant differences between the uptake of the drug [P-HCl 0.01% (0.6 mM) and P-HCl 0.01% (0.6 mM) / CD] were determined in the case of lower concentrated CD solutions [R-CD 0.5% (4.8 mM), HE--CD 0.74% (4.8 mM); Figure 2], whereas higher concentrated CD solutions [R-CD, 8.54% (82 mM), HE--CD 12.01% (82 mM)] seemed to have a statistically significant influence on the uptake of the drug [P-HCl 2% (82 mM)] into porcine cornea (p < 0.05). As far as R-CD-containing solutions are concerned, a marked increase of P-HCl absorbed by the tissue was determined (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The poor ocular bioavailability of P-HCl instilled as an aqueous solution is known to be predominantly due to extensive solution drainage via the nasolacrimal duct 2,3 and tear turnover. 2,4 Noncorneal conjunctival absorption 5 and drug protein binding, [6][7][8] although factors of minor importance, have to be mentioned as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such discrepancy is likely explained by two important differences in study designs. In the present experiment, the concentrations of albumin (0.4% and 1.5%) were specifically chosen based on clinically-relevant albumin levels detected in canine patients with diverse ocular diseases (Sebbag et al, 2019a), taking into account the threefold dilution effect from resident tears (Sebbag et al, 2019b) to better account for the true binding constant seen in dialysis experiments (Chrai and Robinson, 1976). In contrast, the concentrations of albumin used in rabbits were higher (1% and 3%) and may not reflect the range of biological concentrations of albumin at the ocular surface.…”
Section: Ocular Response Of Tropicamide and Latanoprost In The Presenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, although albumin is a major actor of drug-protein binding on the ocular surface, other proteins play a critical role too. Using equilibrium dialysis, Chrai and Robinson showed that sulfisoxazole primarily binds to albumin in tears, but also aglobulin and (to a lesser extent) g-globulin and lysozyme (Chrai and Robinson, 1976), all of which are normal components of tears in dogs and other species. Ultimately, the authors recommend that future investigations be conducted with experimental models of blood-tear barrier breakdown, such as histamine-induced conjunctivitis in dogs (Sebbag et al, 2019a).…”
Section: The Study May Underestimate Drug-proteins Interactions and Tmentioning
confidence: 99%