1969
DOI: 10.1038/222481a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding of Tritiated Actinomycin and Cell Differentiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of AMD binding during spermiogenesis (Brachet and Hulin, 1969 ;Darzynkiewicz, Gledhill, and Ringertz, 1969), in phytohemagglutinin-transformed lymphocytes (Darzynkiewicz, Bolund, and Ringertz, 1969) prednisolonetreated thymocytes (Darzynkiewicz and Andersson, 1971), and in heterochromatin vs. euchromatin within the same nucleus (Berlowitz et al ., 1969) have all indicated reduced ligand binding in condensed chromatin . While a comparison of random and mitotic HeLa cells would have led to the same conclusion, the use of cells synchronized in S and G 2 reveals that AMD binding decreases progressively over this interval and is not temporally coordinated with chromosome coiling per se .…”
Section: Amd Binding Capacity Of Dna Purified From Synchronized Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measurements of AMD binding during spermiogenesis (Brachet and Hulin, 1969 ;Darzynkiewicz, Gledhill, and Ringertz, 1969), in phytohemagglutinin-transformed lymphocytes (Darzynkiewicz, Bolund, and Ringertz, 1969) prednisolonetreated thymocytes (Darzynkiewicz and Andersson, 1971), and in heterochromatin vs. euchromatin within the same nucleus (Berlowitz et al ., 1969) have all indicated reduced ligand binding in condensed chromatin . While a comparison of random and mitotic HeLa cells would have led to the same conclusion, the use of cells synchronized in S and G 2 reveals that AMD binding decreases progressively over this interval and is not temporally coordinated with chromosome coiling per se .…”
Section: Amd Binding Capacity Of Dna Purified From Synchronized Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have indicated that the binding of actinomycin to DNA of living or fixed cells is significantly influenced by the intranuclear organization of the chromatin (Darzynkiewicz, Bolund, and Ringertz, 1969 ;Brachet and Hulin, 1969 ;Berlowitz, et al ., 1969 ;Bolund, 1970) ; in general, highly condensed chromatin binds considerably less actinomycin than the same amount of DNA disposed in a more diffuse configuration . We have employed actinomycin-3H to study the organization of chromatin over the cell division cycle in synchronized HeLa cells and have found significant changes in binding during interphase, when there is no cytological evidence of chromosome condensation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We confirm this observation (Table 1) In other cell systems, when the nuclear genome is activated, the extent to which actinomycin D binds to the nucleus increases (18), and when the nuclear genome is suppressed, the extent to which actinomycin D binds to the nucleus falls (19- 23). Unmasking of DNA in nuclear chromatin is thought to permit binding of actinomycin D to newly accessible DNA sites during genome activation, and masking of DNA is held responsible for decreased actinomycin D binding to nuclear DNA during genome suppression (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) (1974) .--.--.-.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this connection, the binding of actinomycin to chromatin, which is an index of the amount of free DNA, is closely related to genetic activity, or at any rate to the physicochemical characteristics of the DNA-protein complex [12][13][14][15]. The autoradiographic method can be usefully employed with such highly heterogeneous materials in order to obtain a valid comparison between normal and leukaemic cells [16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%