2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding site analysis of full-length α1a adrenergic receptor using homology modeling and molecular docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This view is supported by the impairment of ligand binding seen for receptors mutated at D113(3.32), and by analogy to the binding mode of the catecholamines. In recent years, molecular models for receptor-ligand complexes have been constructed to support that view but in order to enforce the charge-pair interaction deviations from the bovine rhodopsin structure are often proposed (e.g., Bissantz et al, 2003;Ishiguro et al, 2002;Pedretti et al, 2004). In the present study, manual docking of antagonists was required to enforce the charge-pair interaction: the ligands are shifted away from TM5 and towards TM2 and TM7, atoms of the ligands overlap with the receptor, and the antagonists do not fully occupy the binding cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view is supported by the impairment of ligand binding seen for receptors mutated at D113(3.32), and by analogy to the binding mode of the catecholamines. In recent years, molecular models for receptor-ligand complexes have been constructed to support that view but in order to enforce the charge-pair interaction deviations from the bovine rhodopsin structure are often proposed (e.g., Bissantz et al, 2003;Ishiguro et al, 2002;Pedretti et al, 2004). In the present study, manual docking of antagonists was required to enforce the charge-pair interaction: the ligands are shifted away from TM5 and towards TM2 and TM7, atoms of the ligands overlap with the receptor, and the antagonists do not fully occupy the binding cavity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second extracellular loop (EC-II), moves further into the TM framework allowing for the participation of EC-II residues (Thr-174, Cys-176, Gln-177 and Ile-178) in the binding site as observed by Pedretti et al [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…α 1D -AR is a member of the G protein—coupled receptors (GPCRs) family that are constructed by seven transmembrane (TM) helices, N- and C-terminal fragments, and intra- and extracellular loop (ECL) regions21, 22. Molecular docking was performed on α 1D receptor constructed by homology model building using the AutoDock-vina program since the accurate 3D structures of α 1D -AR with high resolutions has not been obtained yet 12 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%