2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binding Thermodynamics of Phosphorylated Inhibitors to Triosephosphate Isomerase and the Contribution of Electrostatic Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 0.1 μM VC1 solution (2 mL) was titrated with successive volumes of 0.02 μM and 0.2 μM QUIN. We adjusted the titration data set according to previous authors [48,49], assuming that the fluorescence intensities of the emitting species (free VC1 and VC1–QUIN complex) are additive, according to Equation 1, where x is the total concentration of inhibitor in the cell, Et represents the total concentration of VC1, K d is the dissociation equilibrium constant ( K d = 1/ K b ) and a denotes the asymptotic value to which Y tends at high x values. Y = 1-F/F t , were F is the overall fluorescence intensity after each addition of QUIN and F t is the fluorescence of free VC1 at the corresponding concentration, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 0.1 μM VC1 solution (2 mL) was titrated with successive volumes of 0.02 μM and 0.2 μM QUIN. We adjusted the titration data set according to previous authors [48,49], assuming that the fluorescence intensities of the emitting species (free VC1 and VC1–QUIN complex) are additive, according to Equation 1, where x is the total concentration of inhibitor in the cell, Et represents the total concentration of VC1, K d is the dissociation equilibrium constant ( K d = 1/ K b ) and a denotes the asymptotic value to which Y tends at high x values. Y = 1-F/F t , were F is the overall fluorescence intensity after each addition of QUIN and F t is the fluorescence of free VC1 at the corresponding concentration, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimentally obtained enthalpy of unfolding for the ScTIM complex is 230 kcal·mol −1 and increases to 284 kcal·mol −1 when PGH is bound. The difference (54 kcal·mol −1 ) is in excellent agreement with the experimentally obtained binding enthalpy (53.7 kcal·mol −1 ) . In contrast, Δ H obs for the TIM63‐PGH complex is 276 kcal·mol −1 , 60% higher than that of the empty form.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…the non‐catalytic side of the barrel (see below). Throughout this work, the TIM from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ScTIM) was selected as a reference for comparison, because its function, structure, folding, stability and catalytic mechanism have been thoroughly characterized . All ancTIMs selected for experimental characterization possess the conserved catalytic triad (K12, H95 and E165 in ScTIM, corresponding to K14, H107 and E182 in the multiple alignment shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations