Hirschi (2004) redefined self-control as the tendency to consider the "full range" of potential costs relevant to a criminal act, suggesting that such costs vary in number and salience based on one's level of self-control. He also suggested selfcontrol, as expressed at the moment of decision, was influenced by the individual's level of social bonding; those with fewer bonds would exhibit less self control by considering fewer costs and finding them less salient when making a decision. This study presents an initial attempt to examine Hirschi's theoretical statement linking concepts from the two theories. Presented with a hypothetical drunk driving scenario, participants were asked to identify perceived costs and salience as a measure of self-control, as Hirschi (2004) suggested. Results support Hirschi's assertion demonstrating that the social bond impacts offending likelihood through its relationship to self-control expressed within the decision. Future theoretical and empirical directions are outlined.Drawing on a theoretical lineage that traces social control (Hirschi 1969) to selfcontrol (Gottfredson and Hirschi 1990), Hirschi (2004) conceived of self-control as "the tendency to consider the full range of potential costs of a particular act [which] moves the focus from the long-term implications of the act to its broader and often contemporaneous implications" (Hirschi 2004, p.543, emphasis in original). While he still generally conceived of self-control as a stable characteristic, he also stated that the proper measure of self-control is the "factors that one takes into account in Am J Crim Just (2011) 36:138-157