2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binge-like intake of sucrose reduces the rewarding value of sucrose in adult rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether the observed gene upregulation is specific to cocaine self-administration or would be observed with passive cocaine intake is not known. Also, we did not observe similar MOP gene regulation in the HPC following a binge sucrose (Smail-Crevier et al, 2018) paradigm F I G U R E 1 Cocaine self-administration in rats. Rats followed a cocaine self-administration paradigm for 10 days (Cocaine-SA, 2 hr/ day) with each infusion delivering 0.33 mg/kg of cocaine, or saline for the control animals (Saline-SA).…”
Section: Role Of Hippocampal Mop In Hpc Following Cocaine-sacontrasting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether the observed gene upregulation is specific to cocaine self-administration or would be observed with passive cocaine intake is not known. Also, we did not observe similar MOP gene regulation in the HPC following a binge sucrose (Smail-Crevier et al, 2018) paradigm F I G U R E 1 Cocaine self-administration in rats. Rats followed a cocaine self-administration paradigm for 10 days (Cocaine-SA, 2 hr/ day) with each infusion delivering 0.33 mg/kg of cocaine, or saline for the control animals (Saline-SA).…”
Section: Role Of Hippocampal Mop In Hpc Following Cocaine-sacontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Whether the observed gene upregulation is specific to cocaine self‐administration or would be observed with passive cocaine intake is not known. Also, we did not observe similar MOP gene regulation in the HPC following a binge sucrose (Smail‐Crevier et al., 2018) paradigm (data not shown), suggesting that natural rewards may not modify MOP expression in this brain region. Moreover, there are scarce data on MOP gene alterations following drug‐SA in HPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…In sum, rodent models of sucrose bingeing provide valuable insight into the behavioural and biological underpinnings of maladaptive eating. Restricting access to palatable food increases the propensity to binge, leading to alterations in reward processing (Smail-Crevier et al, 2018) as well as neurophysiological changes associated with compulsive responding (Maracle et al, 2018). We now identify a contribution of MORs to binge eating, findings that may translate to clinical treatment (Ziauddeen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The approach for this experiment was to allow rats to have access to chow and 10% sucrose either 12 or 24 h per day. Similar to [13], a primary dependent measure was to examine how this manipulation affected sucrose intake in a one-hour daily access period (0800 h).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extension of the choice procedure is the binge intake model where rats are provided access to a sweet solution for either 12 or 24h per day. Rats in the 12h condition drink more sweet solution during the first hour of daily access [13]. Sex differences in binging of fat or a palatable mixture (fat + sugar) have been described, with females binging more than males [14], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%