1979
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90205-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Experiment 3, where depth order should have been unambiguously provided by motion perspective, the addition of changing-size cues further improved vection. These findings sit well with the idea that changing-size and stereoscopic motion channels converge at the same motion-in-depth stage of the visual system (Regan & Beverley, 1979;Regan et al, 1979aRegan et al, , 1979b). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Experiment 3, where depth order should have been unambiguously provided by motion perspective, the addition of changing-size cues further improved vection. These findings sit well with the idea that changing-size and stereoscopic motion channels converge at the same motion-in-depth stage of the visual system (Regan & Beverley, 1979;Regan et al, 1979aRegan et al, , 1979b). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Regan and his colleagues have shown that changing disparity produces more effective motion-in-depth perception than does changing size for fast-moving objects observed for a reasonable period of time (e.g., 1 sec; Regan & Beverley, 1979). The reverse was found for briefly glimpsed, slow-moving objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect is in fact predicted by the motion in depth model put forward by Regan and Beverley (1979), which suggests that changing disparity as a stimulus for motion-in-depth sensation becomes more effective as velocity increases.…”
Section: General Catching Performancementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Blakemore & Campbell, 1969;Blakemore & Nachmias, 1971), motion (e.g., Beverley & Regan, 1973;Levinson & Sekuler, 1980), changing size (e.g., Petersik, Beverley, & Regan, 1981;Regan & Beverley, 1978;Regan & Cynader, 1979), motion in depth (Chase & Smith, 1981;Regan & Beverley, 1979), disparity (Schumer & Ganz, 1979), and possibly others (see Braddick, Campbell, & Atkinson, 1978;Maffei, 1978;Regan, 1982). Moreover, in extensive research determining the effects of selectively adapting these proposed channels, it has been found that these channels appear to fatigue over time with extended viewing and to recover with sufficient rest-very similar to the behavior of the cortical organizations hypothesized to underlie reversible figures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%