2021
DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.10.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Binocularly-driven competing neural responses and the perceptual resolution of color

Abstract: Competing rivalrous neural representations can be resolved at several levels of the visual system. Sustained percepts during interocular-switch rivalry (ISR), in which rivalrous left- and right-eye stimuli swap between eyes several times a second, often are attributed to competing binocularly driven neural representations of each rivalrous stimulus. An alternative view posits monocular neural competition together with a switch in eye dominance at the moment of each stimulus swap between eyes. Here, a range of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experiment 2 tested if eye-of-origin information influenced the measurements when using CISR in conditions with ambiguous and unambiguous representations together. The aim was to test a result found previously using ambiguous objects alone: Resolution of CISR is explained parsimoniously by a binocular rather than monocular (eye-dominance) neural mechanism ( Slezak & Shevell, 2018 ; Zhang, Slezak, Wang, & Shevell, 2021 ). Eye-of-origin information, however, may be a linking cue in some circumstances ( Stuit et al., 2011 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Experiment 2 tested if eye-of-origin information influenced the measurements when using CISR in conditions with ambiguous and unambiguous representations together. The aim was to test a result found previously using ambiguous objects alone: Resolution of CISR is explained parsimoniously by a binocular rather than monocular (eye-dominance) neural mechanism ( Slezak & Shevell, 2018 ; Zhang, Slezak, Wang, & Shevell, 2021 ). Eye-of-origin information, however, may be a linking cue in some circumstances ( Stuit et al., 2011 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%