2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio-electrochemical treatment of distillery wastewater in microbial fuel cell facilitating decolorization and desalination along with power generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
1
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
82
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has been carried out on the treatment of distilleries wastewater. Various conventional methods have been adopted such as biological flocculation (Zhang et al 2009), nanofiltration (Rai et al 2008), activated carbons (Satyawali and Balakrishnan 2007), bioelectrochemical process (Mohanakrishna et al 2010), ozonation-based process (Sreethawong and Chavadej 2008;Lucas et al 2010;Asaithambi et al 2012), electro-oxidation (Piya-areetham et al 2006;Thakur et al 2009), membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis (Nataraj et al 2006) and electrocoagulation (Ponselvan et al 2009). However, conventional methods found to be techno-economically non-feasible for the treatment of organic pollutant present in the effluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has been carried out on the treatment of distilleries wastewater. Various conventional methods have been adopted such as biological flocculation (Zhang et al 2009), nanofiltration (Rai et al 2008), activated carbons (Satyawali and Balakrishnan 2007), bioelectrochemical process (Mohanakrishna et al 2010), ozonation-based process (Sreethawong and Chavadej 2008;Lucas et al 2010;Asaithambi et al 2012), electro-oxidation (Piya-areetham et al 2006;Thakur et al 2009), membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis (Nataraj et al 2006) and electrocoagulation (Ponselvan et al 2009). However, conventional methods found to be techno-economically non-feasible for the treatment of organic pollutant present in the effluent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MFC performance has been tested with different substrates as electrolyte solution, such as swine wastewater, domestic wastewater, distillery wastewater, alkaline substrates, glucose, acetate and microalgae, among others (Martin et al 2010, Mohanakrishna et al 2010, Liao et al 2014, Baicha et al 2016, Kim et al 2016.…”
Section: Microbial Fuel Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TDS of the waste water sample has decreased from 800 mg/L to 320 mg/L. The TDS removal rate is affected by many factors, such as salt solution volume, wastewater volume, microbial oxidation and oxygen reduction [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. …”
Section: E Effect Of Total Dissolved Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the MFC is a biofilm based system, and the accumulation of biomass mainly resides on the electrode except of occasional biofilm falloff, so the suspended solid is low. Another reason is due to the low cell yield of the anoxic to anaerobic microorganisms in the MFC compared to the activated sludge [58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. …”
Section: F Effect Of Total Suspended Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%