2016
DOI: 10.4172/2157-7471.1000331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bio-suppression of Sclerotinia Stem Rot of Tomato and Biostimulation of Plant Growth Using Tomato-associated Rhizobacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three plates were used per each individual treatment. After the incubation period, the diameter of pathogen colony was measured and the percentage of growth inhibition was calculated as previously described [24].…”
Section: Distance Culture Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Three plates were used per each individual treatment. After the incubation period, the diameter of pathogen colony was measured and the percentage of growth inhibition was calculated as previously described [24].…”
Section: Distance Culture Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One day post pathogen challenge, seedlings were transplanted into pots (16 cm in diameter) filled with peat previously infected with 40 ml of fungal inoculum. A reminder bacterial treatment was performed 24 h post-transplanting [24]. Overall, the bioassay included a positive control (pathogenfree and rhizobacteria-free seedlings), a negative control (R. solaniinoculated and untreated seedlings) and 25 treatments consisting of tomato seedlings pathogen-challenged and individually treated with the tested 25 rhizobacterial isolates.…”
Section: Assessment Of Rhizoctonia Root Rot-suppressive and Plant Gromentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations