1999
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620180621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioaccumulation kinetics of brominated flame retardants (polybrominated diphenyl ethers) in blue mussels (Mytilus edulis)

Abstract: Baltic Sea blue mussels, Mytilus edulis, were exposed to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs, IUPAC congeners 47, 99, and 153) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, congeners 31, 52, 77, 118, and 153) in a flow‐through experimental setup for 44 d. After the exposure phase, the mussels were allowed to depurate in natural brackish water for 26 d. After analyses, uptake clearance rate coefficients (ku), depuration rate coefficients (kd), and bioaccumulation factors (BAF) were calculated. A rapid uptake of all PB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same feature has been previously found in mussels by Gustafsson et al (1999) (K d = 0.09 day -1 ) and in turbot by Mhadhbi (2012) (K d ranging from 0.006 to 0.02 day -1 ). In fact, Gustafsson et al (1999) found a better fit of bioaccumulation data to a straight line (r 2 = 0.996) than to an asymptotic model (r 2 = 0.80), and that was also the case of the turbot experiments from Mhadhbi (2012). According to the first order bioaccumulation model, dCt/dt = Cw*Ku -Ct*Ke, a linear uptake would indicate that dCt/dt = Cw*Ku = constant, which is consistent with K d values close to zero.…”
Section: Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same feature has been previously found in mussels by Gustafsson et al (1999) (K d = 0.09 day -1 ) and in turbot by Mhadhbi (2012) (K d ranging from 0.006 to 0.02 day -1 ). In fact, Gustafsson et al (1999) found a better fit of bioaccumulation data to a straight line (r 2 = 0.996) than to an asymptotic model (r 2 = 0.80), and that was also the case of the turbot experiments from Mhadhbi (2012). According to the first order bioaccumulation model, dCt/dt = Cw*Ku -Ct*Ke, a linear uptake would indicate that dCt/dt = Cw*Ku = constant, which is consistent with K d values close to zero.…”
Section: Concentrationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Asterisks indicate significant differences with respect to DMSO control (Bonferroni test; *p \ 0.05; **p \ 0.01; ***p \ 0.001) Furthermore, a previous study from Gustafsson et al (1999) using the same species, found a BCF for BDE-47 of 26,000 L Kg -1 ww. However, these authors used a different methodology and mussels were fed during the exposure.…”
Section: Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Within group I, comprising congeners with no vicinal Hatoms, there are of course more highly chlorinated, and thereby more hydrophobic, congeners. Since the depuration rate decreases with increased hydrophobicity (Gustafsson et al, 1999;Lee, 1992) it is not possible to separate the relative importance of high hydrophobicity vs. low metabolic conversion in causing these high ratios. BSAF det.…”
Section: Metabolic Conversion Of Pcbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioaccumulation in relation to age and size of analysed specimens Some often neglected factors that might affect the BSAF pattern and give rise to interspecific differences, in particular in field sampled animals, is the age and size of the analysed specimens. Both the uptake and depuration rate constants is reduced for very hydrophobic organic contaminants (Gustafsson et al, 1999;Hawker & Connel, 1985). This might have the effect that a very long time is required to reach steady state in the partitioning of highly chlorinated CBs between sediment and animals.…”
Section: Metabolic Conversion Of Pcbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is not surprising that PBDEs and PCBs have been found to be bioaccumulated in human, aquatic wildlife, and other ecosystems around the world [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Contamination in environment could include releases from manufacturing sites, poor management of hazardous waste sites that contain PCBs/PBDEs and disposal of PCB/PBDE products into non-hazardous waste.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%