2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.01.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioaccumulation of heavy metals and health risk assessment in three benthic bivalves along the coast of Laizhou Bay, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the two determinative factors of the THM concentration and body weight, estimated maximum intake (EMI) and the estimated daily intake (EDI) were calculated to assess aHI and HQ. The relevant equations were as follows: EMI=FIR×CmaxnormalBW EDI=EF×ED×FIR×CavgBW×Ta aHI=normalEMInormalRfD×100% HQ=normalEDInormalADI×100% where FIR represents the per capita ingestion rate (0.05 kg person −1 d −1 ); C max is the maximum concentration of THMs (in mg kg −1 ); EF is the frequency of exposure (365 d yr −1 ); ED, the exposure period (70 years); C avg is the mean concentration of THMs (in mg kg −1 ); BW, mean body weight for adults (60 kg) and children (25 kg); T a is the mean exposure time (365 d yr −1 × ED); the daily exposure reference dose (RfD) for Pb, As, Cr, Cd and Hg are 0.0036, 0.003, 0.003, 0.001 and 0.0001 mg kg −1 d −1 , respectively; the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for Pb, As, Cr, Cd and Hg are 214, 128, 60, 43 and 200 µg d −1 by the World Health Organization (WHO), respectively; the mean body weight for ADI calculation (50 kg).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the two determinative factors of the THM concentration and body weight, estimated maximum intake (EMI) and the estimated daily intake (EDI) were calculated to assess aHI and HQ. The relevant equations were as follows: EMI=FIR×CmaxnormalBW EDI=EF×ED×FIR×CavgBW×Ta aHI=normalEMInormalRfD×100% HQ=normalEDInormalADI×100% where FIR represents the per capita ingestion rate (0.05 kg person −1 d −1 ); C max is the maximum concentration of THMs (in mg kg −1 ); EF is the frequency of exposure (365 d yr −1 ); ED, the exposure period (70 years); C avg is the mean concentration of THMs (in mg kg −1 ); BW, mean body weight for adults (60 kg) and children (25 kg); T a is the mean exposure time (365 d yr −1 × ED); the daily exposure reference dose (RfD) for Pb, As, Cr, Cd and Hg are 0.0036, 0.003, 0.003, 0.001 and 0.0001 mg kg −1 d −1 , respectively; the acceptable daily intake (ADI) for Pb, As, Cr, Cd and Hg are 214, 128, 60, 43 and 200 µg d −1 by the World Health Organization (WHO), respectively; the mean body weight for ADI calculation (50 kg).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endogenous factors such as body size, growth, fitness, reproductive condition and genotypes [21], the differences in biokinetic uptake, depuration rate, and other physiological processes could contribute to the variations in the heavy metal concentration in tissues [22]. Meanwhile, the exogenous factors could be salinity, metal bioavailability [23], alkalinity, and others [19]. Pearson correlation between metals in muscle tissues in P. reticulata showed in Table 1 and a significantly positive linear correlation (p < 0.05) were observed between concentrations of some metals (As-Co, Cr-Fe, Hg-Ni, Co-Ni, Mn-Ni, Cd-Se, Mo-Tl) and significantly negative linear correlation (p < 0.05) (Cu-Tl and Pb-V).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transduction of heavy metal stress signaling is started by ion channels/receptors through awareness of stress signals and also through non-protein messengers like hydrogen ions, calcium and cyclic nucleotides as given in ( Figure 1 ). Several studies reported the importance of these signaling molecules and responsive genes in plants against the stress induced by HMs [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Signaling Response In Plants Against Heavy Metal Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%