2008
DOI: 10.1002/mmnd.20030500110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioacoustic and morphological differentiation in two allopatric species Tibicina Amyot (Hemiptera, Cicadoidea) in Portugal

Abstract: The present study describes the calling songs produced by males of two closely related species of Tibicina Amyot (T. quadrisignata (Hagen) and T garricola Boulard) and correlates such divergence with their patterns of general morphological variation. It is here rationalised that in cicadas for the Mediterranean area we can find two main patterns of specific divergence within groups of closely related species: (i) one, where considerable acoustic divergence was attained with practically no or low levels of morp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in the case of the genus Tibicina Amyot, conspicuous morphological divergence is associated with very subtle acoustic differentiation (Quartau & Simões, 2003;Sueur & Aubin, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the case of the genus Tibicina Amyot, conspicuous morphological divergence is associated with very subtle acoustic differentiation (Quartau & Simões, 2003;Sueur & Aubin, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No hybrid specimen between Tibicina species has ever been reported in the literature and signal analysis did not show intermediate values between the calling or courtship songs of different Tibicina species (Sueur and Aubin, 2003, 2004). Reproductive barriers appear to be secured not only by acoustic barriers, but also by a set of behavioural and ecological parameters, including spatial, habitat and/or temporal isolation (Sueur and Puissant, 2002; Quartau and Simões, 2003; Sueur et al ., 2004). It has also been shown from laboratory experiments (Claridge and de Vrijer, 1994) that distinct differences in male calls among allopatric populations cannot be taken necessarily to indicate biological species status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%