Bioacoustic detection of Callosobruchus chinensis and Callosobruchus maculatus in bulk stored chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and green gram (Vigna radiata)

Banga, Km. Sheetal; Kotwaliwale, Nachiket; Mohapatra, Debabandya; Giri, Saroj Kumar; Babu, V. Bhushana

doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.02.026

Cited by 21 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to the economic damage caused by this insect, the qualitative and quantitative losses are related to larval penetration inside the grains [ 3 ]. In grains infested with this insect, a high content of moisture and ash was observed, while nutritional values, such as carbohydrate and crude fate levels, were decreased [ 4 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Insecticidal Properties of a Chemically Characterized Essential Oil from the Leaves of Dittrichia viscosa L.

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since some synthetic insecticides cause damage to human health, compounds in plants can be viable alternatives to conventional synthetic pesticides. Dittrichia viscosa L. is a perennial Mediterranean plant known to possess biological activities, including insecticidal properties. The chemical composition of an essential oil (EOD) from D. viscosa, as well as its antioxidant, antimicrobial, and insecticidal effects on the cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) were determined. Forty-one volatile compounds were identified in EOD, which accounted for 97.5% of its constituents. Bornyl acetate (41%) was a major compound, followed by borneol (9.3%), α-amorphene (6.6%), and caryophyllene oxide (5.7%). EOD exhibited significant antioxidant activity in all tests performed, with an IC50 of 1.30 ± 0.05 mg/mL in the DPPH test and an EC50 equal to 36.0 ± 2.5 mg/mL in the FRAP assay. In the phosphor-molybdenum test, EOD results ranged from 39.81 ± 0.7 to 192.1 ± 0.8 mg AAE/g E. EOD was active on E. coli (9.5 ± 0.5 mm), S. aureus (31.0 ± 1.5 mm), C. albicans (20.4 ± 0.5 mm), and S. cerevisiae (28.0 ± 1.0 mm), with MICs ranging from 0.1 mg/mL to 3.3 mg/mL. We found that 1 µL of EOD caused 97.5 ± 5.0% insect mortality after 96 h in the inhalation test and 60.0 ± 8.3% in the ingestion assay. The median lethal concentration (LC50) was 7.8 ± 0.3 μL EO/L, while the effective concentration in the ingestion test (LC50) was 15.0 ± 2.1 μL EO/L. We found that 20 µL of EOD caused a reduction of more than 91% of C. maculatus laid eggs.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Insecticidal Properties of a Chemically Characterized Essential Oil from the Leaves of Dittrichia viscosa L.

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mahendran 2020) studied the resistance of 15 chickpea genotypes against C. chinenensis L. They also found that in both free choice and no-choice tests among the test genotypes only one of the genotypes exhibited complete resistance to C. chinensis L. This shows that plant breeding is also unable and cannot be an effective way to control C. chinensis L 62 . Banga et al (2019) studied the bioacoustic detection of Callosobruchus chinensis L. and Callosobruchus maculatus in bulk stored chickpea and green gram. They concluded that this method is rapid and nondestructive for the detection of infestation in bulk stored food legumes 63 .…”

Section: Rumbos Et Al (2017) Used Beauveria Bassiana and Metarhizium ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cold Plasma the Green Alternative for Control of Pulse Beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)

Pathan

Deshmukh

Annapure

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the current context of the problems created by the use of pesticides, cold plasma treatment found to be the best alternative in the protection of chickpea from pulse beetle invasion during storage up to few years. Cold plasma is proven method of food preservation which control food spoilage at very lower temperatures. The prospective potential of cold plasma treatment to control the pulse beetle Callosobruchus chinensis L. infestation of chickpea for the storage period of about five years after plasma treatment was studied. Chickpea cultivars Vijay and Digvijay were used. Pulse beetle un-infested plasma untreated, pulse beetle un-infested plasma-treated, pulse beetle infested plasma untreated and pulse beetle infested plasma-treated samples studied for comparative pest status after every quarter. Cold plasma treatment at 40, 50, and 60 W power each for 10, 15, 20 min. was applied. The samples were stored in an airtight zip lock pouch under laboratory conditions. Cold plasma was found most effective in controlling the pulse beetle infestation of previously un-infested plasma-treated and previously infested plasma-treated samples when compared to pulse beetle un-infested plasma untreated and pulse beetle infested plasma untreated chickpea samples. Also, the present research aims to put the step to establish the scientific base to study the stored grain pest infestation for such a long period which will be helpful to validate the results obtained during such preliminary short-term studies.

show abstract

“…Acoustic detection of insect activities is based on distinct sounds made by the larvae displacement when they are feeding or biochemical reactions in the pest-infested food that creates low-intensity ultrasonic sounds [17,95]. For example, crawling and feeding of two insects Callosobruchus chinensis and Callosobruchus maculatus in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and mung bean or green gram (Vigna radiata) were monitored using a condenser-type microphone probe, with a frequency range of 20-16 KHz, placed inside an acoustic-proof bin [96]. Their results provided sound signatures for Callosobruchus chinensis and Callosobruchus maculatus insects as having a sound duration of 59 and 68 ms, and amplitude of 79.32 and 97.65 dB in chickpea and 84.01 and 95.53 dB in green gram, respectively.…”

Section: Acoustic Techniques For Insect Infestation Detectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Non-Destructive Technologies for Detecting Insect Infestation in Fruits and Vegetables under Postharvest Conditions: A Critical Review

Adedeji

Ekramirad

Rady

et al. 2020

Foods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last two decades, food scientists have attempted to develop new technologies that can improve the detection of insect infestation in fruits and vegetables under postharvest conditions using a multitude of non-destructive technologies. While consumers’ expectations for higher nutritive and sensorial value of fresh produce has increased over time, they have also become more critical on using insecticides or synthetic chemicals to preserve food quality from insects’ attacks or enhance the quality attributes of minimally processed fresh produce. In addition, the increasingly stringent quarantine measures by regulatory agencies for commercial import–export of fresh produce needs more reliable technologies for quickly detecting insect infestation in fruits and vegetables before their commercialization. For these reasons, the food industry investigates alternative and non-destructive means to improve food quality. Several studies have been conducted on the development of rapid, accurate, and reliable insect infestation monitoring systems to replace invasive and subjective methods that are often inefficient. There are still major limitations to the effective in-field, as well as postharvest on-line, monitoring applications. This review presents a general overview of current non-destructive techniques for the detection of insect damage in fruits and vegetables and discusses basic principles and applications. The paper also elaborates on the specific post-harvest fruit infestation detection methods, which include principles, protocols, specific application examples, merits, and limitations. The methods reviewed include those based on spectroscopy, imaging, acoustic sensing, and chemical interactions, with greater emphasis on the noninvasive methods. This review also discusses the current research gaps as well as the future research directions for non-destructive methods’ application in the detection and classification of insect infestation in fruits and vegetables.

show abstract

Bioacoustic detection of Callosobruchus chinensis and Callosobruchus maculatus in bulk stored chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and green gram (Vigna radiata)

Cited by 21 publications

References 25 publications

Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Insecticidal Properties of a Chemically Characterized Essential Oil from the Leaves of Dittrichia viscosa L.

Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Insecticidal Properties of a Chemically Characterized Essential Oil from the Leaves of Dittrichia viscosa L.

Cold Plasma the Green Alternative for Control of Pulse Beetle (Callosobruchus chinensis L.)

Non-Destructive Technologies for Detecting Insect Infestation in Fruits and Vegetables under Postharvest Conditions: A Critical Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About