Bioacoustic monitoring reveals shifts in breeding songbird populations and singing behaviour with selective logging in tropical forests

Abstract

1. Selective logging is the primary cause of tropical forest degradation and is rapidly expanding worldwide. While the impacts of logging on species diversity and distributions are well understood, little is known about the effects of logging on animal behaviours central to individual fitness and population persistence.2. The song rate of breeding songbirds is a behavioural trait that is often positively associated with male density and used by conspecific females as an indicator of territory and male quality. Thus, contrasting logging-induced adjustments in song rates of individual birds with population shifts may illuminate potential mechanisms underlying population distributions.3. We present a novel application of bioacoustic monitoring, integrating counts of individuals, songs and duets from single automated recording units (ARUs) with N-mixture models, to estimate shifts in population parameters (occupancy, abundance) and singing behaviours (per-capita song rates, per-pair duet rates) of 32 Bornean songbird species with logging. We tested hypotheses on the relationships between adjustments in behavioural and population parameters with logging, and further tested the extent to which species traits predicted behavioural and population shifts.4. Adjustments to singing behaviour in 59 and 53% of species (57% of duetting species) were concordant with differences in occupancy and abundance respectively, such that species showing reduced populations with logging also produced fewer songs per-capita, and vice versa. Species known to prefer undisturbed habitats and large-bodied species showed the most negative effects of logging on singing behaviour and population distributions. Species known to exploit degraded habitats exhibited the opposite pattern. Subdued singing in logged forests by species of conservation concern suggests limited competition between territorial males in small populations and may also signal low-quality territories. Synthesis and applications.We demonstrate that bioacoustic monitoring can be used to not only estimate important population parameters of occupancy and | 2483Journal of Applied Ecology PILLAY et AL.

Bioacoustic analyses reveal that bird communities recover with forest succession in tropical dry forests

“…We ascribed all vocalizations to species whenever possible. In many cases it was obvious that there were multiple individuals of a single species within a recording because of overlapping songs or the position of the vocalization relative to the stereo microphones; we conservatively calculated abundance using the position of birds relative to the microphones and overlapping songs as indicators of multiple individuals (Pillay et al 2019). We included only resident species in our analyses, and removed any passage migrants (see Results).…”

A community context for aggression? Multi‐species audience effects on territorial aggression in two species of Paridae

“…This is due primarily to historical development of the topic, beginning with human sociology and then primarily sexual selection work animals; hence, the vast majority of studies on audience effects is limited to the conspecific context. Therefore, the distinct signature of heterospecific audience effects on aggression response probability and intensity we detected suggest further study may deepen understanding of animal community dynamics and potential conservation applications (Buchholz et al, 2019;Pillay et al, 2019;Tobias & Pigot, 2019).…”

Community Bioacoustics: Studying Acoustic Community Structure for Ecological and Conservation Insights

“…For this reason, passive acoustic monitoring has increased in popularity both in marine and terrestrial environments. Human activities such as landuse change could fundamentally alter spatiotemporal acoustic community structure (Zuk et al, 2006;Gasc et al, 2018;Torrent et al, 2018;Pillay et al, 2019), at the extreme resulting in the loss of natural sounds (Pijanowski et al, 2011a;Sueur et al, 2019). Quantifying these effects is very important in developing conservation policy for diverse ecosystems, from forests and deserts to the ocean depths.…”

“…Although approaches driven by indices are gaining popularity in passive acoustic studies, there is also great benefit in approaches that provide species-level, natural history-driven information that is of direct use in informing conservation policy. Community bioacoustics, and specifically acoustic community structure, is an approach that provides this information, from the entire community down to individual species (Krishnan, 2019a;Pillay et al, 2019). By quantifying the distributions and volume occupied by species in community signal space, together with phylogenetic diversity (Lahiri et al, 2021; Figure 4), field researchers may compare them across environmental conditions or grades of anthropogenic impact.…”