Previous reports
indicated the low stability of severe actute respiratory
syndrome coronovirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on various porous surfaces, but
the role of porosity was unclear because there was no direct comparison
between porous and nonporous solids of the same chemistry. Through
comparing pairs of solids with very similar chemistry, we find that
porosity is important: porous glass has a much lower infectivity than
nonporous glass. However, porosity is not sufficient to lower infectivity;
permeability, which is the ability of a liquid to move through a material,
is the important parameter. We show this by comparing a pair of porous
CuO coatings where the pores are accessible in one case and inaccessible
in the other case. When the pores are inaccessible, the infectivity
remains similar to that for nonporous solids. Thus, for both glass
and CuO, it is the access to porosity that decreases the infectivity
of extracted liquid droplets. Having established the importance of
permeability, there is the open question of the mechanism of changing
the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2. Several hypotheses are possible, such
as increasing the difficulty of extracting the virus from the solid,
changing the drying time, increasing the surface area of active ingredient,
etc. Reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction
(RT-qPCR) measurements show that less viral DNA is extracted from
a permeable surface, suggesting that the virus becomes trapped in
the pores. Finally, we consider the effect of drying. We show that
permeability and the water contact angle on the solid have effects
on the drying time of a contaminated droplet, which may in turn affect
infectivity.