Biomaterials in Clinical Practice 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68025-5_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioactive Coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 214 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The introduction of bioactive agents into degradable or water-soluble synthetic polymers is also reported as an effective strategy . Polylactones and PEGs are effectively used as supportive coatings to carry bioactive agents . The modified polymers are also used to create either substrate-adhering nanofilms or hydrogel-based thick coatings with high bioactivity to stimulate cell adhesion or to avoid microbial adhesion.…”
Section: Different Types Of Surface Tuning Strategies To Enhance Bact...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of bioactive agents into degradable or water-soluble synthetic polymers is also reported as an effective strategy . Polylactones and PEGs are effectively used as supportive coatings to carry bioactive agents . The modified polymers are also used to create either substrate-adhering nanofilms or hydrogel-based thick coatings with high bioactivity to stimulate cell adhesion or to avoid microbial adhesion.…”
Section: Different Types Of Surface Tuning Strategies To Enhance Bact...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioactive glass (BG) has been commonly studied as a bone substitute due to its outstanding biological properties, such as great binding to newly formed bone tissue and the deposition of a carbonated hydroxyapatite layer on its surface that promotes bone regeneration [1]. The first BG reported in the literature was initially studied by Hench et al [2], BG (45S5 ® ), which allows the artificial organ to effectively fit into the bone cavity [3] and has been gaining space in clinical applications such as Perioglas ® [4] and Ceravital ® [5]. Its first application in orthopedics was approved by the FDA in 2000 [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Beside of the good biocompatibility, excellent chemical resistance and good mechanical properties, it also has a closer Young's elastic modulus to the human cortical bones. [4] Modifying to improve its bioactivity can reduce the rate of implantation failure caused by poor osseointegration and avoid secondary surgeries, reducing the economic burden of the patients. Currently, two strategies are available for improving the bioactivity of polymer including composite preparation (incorporating bioactive materials into polymer) and surface treatment/coating with physical/chemical methods [5] Among these strategies, impregnating bioactive materials into polymer has become an attractive approach for improving the bioactivity while maintaining its mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) ANOVA test for all implant groups of two intervals Multiple Comparisons among different tested groups of implants after 2 and 6 weeks intervals, done by using the Post hoc/Bonferroni test, this test mentioned that, there was a statistically highly significant difference between (pure PEKK) groups at 2 and all groups at 6 weeks' time intervals for implantation , as shown in table(4), meanwhile comparison among groups of (Sr-HA coating PEKK)and (Sr-HA / PEKK composite) after two period of implantation 2 and 6 weeks, as shown in Table(4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%