2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.152789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioactivity profiling of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) identifies potential toxicity pathways related to molecular structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
74
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
6
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to enriched biological pathways, we investigated transcription factor enrichment and identified 43 transcription factors that were differentially expressed within our FBSA exposure dataset ( Table S6 ). Among these was Nuclear Factor erythroid-2 (NRF2), previously shown to be activated by various PFAS exposures in HepG2 cell assays ( Houck et al., 2021 ) and to modulate embryonic zebrafish response to PFOS exposure ( Sant et al., 2018 ). Our analysis also identified 191 enriched transcription factors predicted to regulate genes that were differentially expressed within our dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to enriched biological pathways, we investigated transcription factor enrichment and identified 43 transcription factors that were differentially expressed within our FBSA exposure dataset ( Table S6 ). Among these was Nuclear Factor erythroid-2 (NRF2), previously shown to be activated by various PFAS exposures in HepG2 cell assays ( Houck et al., 2021 ) and to modulate embryonic zebrafish response to PFOS exposure ( Sant et al., 2018 ). Our analysis also identified 191 enriched transcription factors predicted to regulate genes that were differentially expressed within our dataset.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most notably within this list is Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor alpha (PPARα), predicted to regulate 36 of the genes disrupted by FBSA exposure. PPARα has been widely associated with PFAS toxicity in the literature, specifically related to the dysfunction of lipid metabolism and liver processes ( Fenton et al., 2021 ; Houck et al., 2021 ). Other transcription factors predicted to regulate FBSA-induced DE-Gs include Retinoid X Receptor alpha (RXRα, 56 DE-Gs) and Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor (AHR, 54 DE-Gs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this work describes the first PFAS HTTS using a placental cell line, though prior work has leveraged other cell lines in PFAS HTTS efforts. A subclone of human hepatocellular carcinoma-derived HepG2 cells expressing elevated CYP have been used to test 142 unique PFAS for 81 different transcription factor activities ( Houck et al, 2021 ). This work similarly utilized a 24-h exposure period with exposure concentrations ranging from 0.137 to 300 µM and demonstrated nuclear receptor activation at concentrations lower than 1 µM in some cases ( Houck et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subclone of human hepatocellular carcinoma-derived HepG2 cells expressing elevated CYP have been used to test 142 unique PFAS for 81 different transcription factor activities ( Houck et al, 2021 ). This work similarly utilized a 24-h exposure period with exposure concentrations ranging from 0.137 to 300 µM and demonstrated nuclear receptor activation at concentrations lower than 1 µM in some cases ( Houck et al, 2021 ). Taken together with the gene expression results reported here at the 1 and 3 µM exposure level, these data suggest PFAS exposure can initiate molecular events at concentrations considerably lower than those required to perturb functional endpoints at the level of the cell (e.g., migration).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly targeted processes include disruption of nuclear receptors including the Constitutive Androstane Receptor (CAR), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α (PPARα), and the Pregnane X Recptor (PXR), as well as pathways governing cell cycle regulation such as p53 signaling (reviewed in [ 33 ]). Other studies in vitro have shown PFAS have affinity for both PPARα and PPARγ, Estrogen Receptor α, and the antioxidant response pathway as regulated by Nrf2 [ 34 ]. Even with increased affinity for these nuclear receptor pathways, another in vitro study has shown that PFAS exposures to hepatic cells reduce expression of phase I and II detoxification enzymes, including cytochrome P450s (1A2, 2C19, and 3A4), glutathione-S-transferase (M1), and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (1A1) [ 35 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%