2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioanalytical and chemical characterization of organic micropollutant mixtures in long-term exposed passive samplers from the Joint Danube Survey 4: Setting a baseline for water quality monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been adopted by regulatory agencies in France [12,13] and Slovakia [14] for prioritisation studies at the national level [15]. More recently, the risk indicators of the NORMAN Prioritisation Framework have been used to identify risk drivers related to surfactants and their transformation products in wastewater [16] and in passive samplers in the Danube river [17]. However, this is all based on target chemical analysis results.…”
Section: The Norman Database System and Original Prioritisation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been adopted by regulatory agencies in France [12,13] and Slovakia [14] for prioritisation studies at the national level [15]. More recently, the risk indicators of the NORMAN Prioritisation Framework have been used to identify risk drivers related to surfactants and their transformation products in wastewater [16] and in passive samplers in the Danube river [17]. However, this is all based on target chemical analysis results.…”
Section: The Norman Database System and Original Prioritisation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final score (target + suspect screening) = Expo + Haz + Risk NOTE: 1) For the calculation of the Hazard score the indicators and the associated weights can be adjusted according to speci c prioritisation objectives; 2) In the current algorithm, each indicator has the same weight in the calculation of the Risk score. However, a lower weight (1/2) could be given to the MRC indicator as compared to the FoE, as proposed by Sauer et al [17], in order to re ect that the relevance of a compound contributing based on mixture risks (i.e., RQ between 0.1 and 1) is lower compared to a compound exceeding the PNEC as individual substance (RQ > 1).…”
Section: Prioritisation Of Substances Within Each Categorymentioning
confidence: 99%