2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioanalytical tools for the evaluation of organic micropollutants during sewage treatment, water recycling and drinking water generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
87
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
12
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the majority of NDMA exposure for humans is not from drinking water consumption and the increased risk to human health from NDMA provided by drinking water consumption is still relatively minor. Our assessment of a low health risk from ROtreated WW agrees with other assessments undertaken using multiple bioassays (Van Buynder et al 2009;Escher et al 2011;Macova et al 2011). In particular, screening undertaken during the project using a cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay with a human lymphoblastoid cell-line indicated that there was no significant cytotoxicity or genotoxicity for either secondary wastewater or RO-treated wastewater (Van Buynder et al 2009), and the toxicity of RO-treated WW has been shown to be indistinguishable from that of drinking water .…”
Section: Screening Health Risk Assessment Of Ro Permeatesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Thus the majority of NDMA exposure for humans is not from drinking water consumption and the increased risk to human health from NDMA provided by drinking water consumption is still relatively minor. Our assessment of a low health risk from ROtreated WW agrees with other assessments undertaken using multiple bioassays (Van Buynder et al 2009;Escher et al 2011;Macova et al 2011). In particular, screening undertaken during the project using a cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay with a human lymphoblastoid cell-line indicated that there was no significant cytotoxicity or genotoxicity for either secondary wastewater or RO-treated wastewater (Van Buynder et al 2009), and the toxicity of RO-treated WW has been shown to be indistinguishable from that of drinking water .…”
Section: Screening Health Risk Assessment Of Ro Permeatesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Neurotoxicity was reduced by 73% during the sewage treatment process and 100% reduction was achieved at the end of the GWRP. This reduction efficiency corresponds well to the study of Macova et al (2011) on reclamation plants in Australia. Cytotoxicity was low overall and only recorded in the GSTP inlet for March 2010 andFebruary 2011 (13% and25% respectively).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Toxicity of raw and treated wastewater has been demonstrated in previous research (Farcy et al, 2011;Gagné et al, 2011;Macova et al, 2011). Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) like polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorine pesticides, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are typically responsible for many of the toxic effects of wastewater and are characterised by persistence, resisting chemical and biological degradation; the most effective means of removal seems to be dissolved organic carbon (DOC), powder activated carbon (PAC) and ozonation (Bolong et al, 2009;Katsoyiannis and Samara, 2007a;Stalter et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect-directed analysis (EDA) has been proposed to solve this problem by using combined chemical analysis and bioassay based on fractionation (Campbell et al 2006;Brack et al 2008;Simon et al 2013). The EDA method has been successfully applied to determine toxicants responsible for some specific effects (Creusot et al 2013;Macova et al 2011;Regueiro et al 2013;Rostkowski et al 2011;Schmitt et al 2012;Yue et al 2015). Bioanalytical tools such…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%