2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2013.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioassay of chemically treated subbituminous coal derivatives using Pseudomonas putida F1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research on microbial-enhanced coalbed methane (MECoM) production has been conducted in four general directions: 1) microbial stimulation involving in-situ nutrient amendment; 2) bioaugmentation through injection of enrichment culture; 3) increasing coal accessibility via physical fracturing; and 4) enhancement of bioavailability by biotic or abiotic pretreatments (Ritter et al, 2015). A substantial body of work has demonstrated the feasibility of the above methods (Fallgren et al, 2013a;Fallgren et al, 2013b;Furmann et al, 2013b;Green et al, 2008;Hang et al, 2017;Harris et al, 2008;Huang et al, 2013;Jones et al, 2010;Jones et al, 2008;Papendick et al, 2011;Ritter et al, 2015;Susilawati et al, 2013). Nevertheless, the field of MECoM research is still in the stage of exploration and a better fundamental understanding is necessary to assess the maximum methanogenic potential and possible improvements on the tiny conversion of coal to methane (normally below 1%.…”
Section: The Emerging Concept Of Microbially Enhanced Coalbed Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on microbial-enhanced coalbed methane (MECoM) production has been conducted in four general directions: 1) microbial stimulation involving in-situ nutrient amendment; 2) bioaugmentation through injection of enrichment culture; 3) increasing coal accessibility via physical fracturing; and 4) enhancement of bioavailability by biotic or abiotic pretreatments (Ritter et al, 2015). A substantial body of work has demonstrated the feasibility of the above methods (Fallgren et al, 2013a;Fallgren et al, 2013b;Furmann et al, 2013b;Green et al, 2008;Hang et al, 2017;Harris et al, 2008;Huang et al, 2013;Jones et al, 2010;Jones et al, 2008;Papendick et al, 2011;Ritter et al, 2015;Susilawati et al, 2013). Nevertheless, the field of MECoM research is still in the stage of exploration and a better fundamental understanding is necessary to assess the maximum methanogenic potential and possible improvements on the tiny conversion of coal to methane (normally below 1%.…”
Section: The Emerging Concept Of Microbially Enhanced Coalbed Methanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This TOC content was from pretreatment that was conducted with nitric acid at 3.33 mol/L for 4 months (Huang et al, 2013b). Although results obtained from different studies may not be comparable owing to different mechanisms, the optimal value determined in this study for the critical parameters did lead to more efficient coal depolymerization and dissolution compared with those reported so far.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Soluble Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Throughout the years, different chemicals, such as strong acids, strong bases and oxidants have been investigated regarding their effects on solubilizing coal (Alvarez et al, 2003;Hayatsu et al, 1981;Huang et al, 2013b). For subbituminous coal sampled from the Powder River Basin (PRB), nitric acid at 3.33 mol/L was found to depolymerize the coal the best compared to sodium hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide and permanganate (Huang et al, 2013b). However, the compounds in the water soluble phases derived from nitric acid and sodium hydroxide treatments were shown to be relatively recalcitrant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical pretreatment is widely studied in the biotransformation of coal. The reported chemical reagents include potassium permanganate (KMnO 4 ) [14], hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) [15][16][17], nitric acid (HNO 3 ) [18,19], sodium hydroxide (NaOH) [20,21], and so on. These reagents are proven to enhance methane production by increasing the solubility of organic carbon in coal, especially subbituminous coal and lignite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, NaOH pretreatment has been reported to increase the solubility of coal. Huang et al treated subbitumious with NaOH, and found the enhancement of solubility of organic carbon and the releasement of aromatic fragments with low molecular weight [20,21]. Most reported chemical pretreatments including NaOH pretreatment were performed on low-rank coal or bituminous coal, while anthracite has rarely been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%