2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2003.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocatalytic esterification of β-methylglucoside for synthesis of biocompatible sugar-containing vinyl esters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall effect of temperature is also affected by other factors such as the amount and type of substrate used, and presence of water in the reaction. Also, substrate molar ratio is an important factor to obtain the highest product yield and the lowest side reaction (Kim et al, 2004). Temperature, substrate molar ratio (SR), and Lipozyme TLIM had a negative effect whereas Novozym 435 had a positive effect on stearic acid incorporation.…”
Section: Effect Of Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The overall effect of temperature is also affected by other factors such as the amount and type of substrate used, and presence of water in the reaction. Also, substrate molar ratio is an important factor to obtain the highest product yield and the lowest side reaction (Kim et al, 2004). Temperature, substrate molar ratio (SR), and Lipozyme TLIM had a negative effect whereas Novozym 435 had a positive effect on stearic acid incorporation.…”
Section: Effect Of Parametersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Kim and co‐workers reported the synthesis of vinyl sugar ester by the transesterification of β‐methyl glucoside with vinyl methacrylate or vinyl acrylate in both homogeneous and heterogeneous media catalyzed by Novozym® 435. In both media, the conversion of the glucoside was 100%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 H NMR (δ in ppm) of MGAA : 5.96, 6.12 (1, CHCH 2 ), 5.61, 5.84 (2, CHCH 2 ), 6.3, 6.43 (3, CHCH 2 ). MGMAA : 1.98 (1, CH 2 CCH 3 ), 5.58, 5.64 (2, CH 2 CCH 3 ), 6.11, 6.24 (3, CH 2 CCH 3 ), all splitted 13, 14, 17. Structures and carbon numbers of MGAA and MGMAA for 13 C NMR spectra are shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 C NMR/CDCl 3 (δ in ppm) of MGAA : 59.90 (OCH 3 , 1), 63.79 (C‐7), 69.70 (C‐6), 73.17 (C‐4), 75.82 (C‐5), 75.99 (C‐3), 103.31 (C‐2), 128.13 (CCH 2 , 9), 131.76 (CCH 2 , 10), 166.34 (CO, 8). MGMAA : 18.31 (CH 3 , 9), 56.96 (OCH 3 , 1), 64.37 (C‐7), 70.58 (C‐6), 73.37 (C‐4), 73.75 (C‐5), 76.32 (C‐3), 103.40 (C‐2), 126.46 (CCH 2 , 10), 135.96 (CCH 2 , 11), 167.81 (CO, 8) 13, 14…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation