“…The yield of the reaction on analytical scale was determined by GC using 4methylcyclohexanone as internal standard. The absolute configurations of the compounds were determined comparing the sign of their specific rotation with those of the literature: for (1S,5R,6S)-1 23 [h] D = −36.3 (c 2.27, CHCl 3 ); for (1R,5S,6R)-10 24 [h] D =−68 (c 1.1, CHCl 3 ); for (1R,2S)-2 25 [h] D =−37.4 (c 1.50, CHCl 3 ); for (1S,2R)-11 26 [h] D =18 (c 1.0, MeOH); for (1S,2S)-3 27 [h] D =69.9 (c 0.64, EtOH); for (1R,2R)-12 28 [h] D =−38.2 (c 9.6, EtOH); for (R)-13 26 [h] D =14 (c 0.23, MeOH); for (S)-16 28 h D =−17 (neat); for (S)-7 29 h D =−33 (neat); for (R)-8 30 [h] D =21.2 (c 8.6, EtOH). The absolute configurations of compounds 9 31 and 14 32 were assigned comparing the signs of their specific rotation with those of the literature: (R)-(−)-9 and (R)-(−)-14.…”