“…On the other hand, continuous flow reactors have been thoroughly studied in the last 2 decades, but especially in the last years this discipline has experienced a sharp increase in the number of publications, as seen in Figure 1, with several different reported applications of this technology, and a special emphasis in miniaturized flow reactors and also in carrying out reactions that underperform in batch (Valera et al, 2010;Plutschack et al, 2017;De Santis et al, 2020). This is not a surprise if we consider the many advantages that flow systems present over batch ones, especially when considering microscale reactors (Bolivar et al, 2011;Žnidaršič-Plazl, 2021a;Žnidaršič-Plazl, 2021b). Amongst these advantages we must mention that they are adequate for processes involving heterogeneous catalysis, such as those using immobilized enzymes (Gkantzou et al, 2018;Thompson et al, 2018), they have very fast mixing and heat exchange rate (Hartman et al, 2011;Gürsel et al, 2015;Cambie et al, 2016), large interfacial area when dealing with multiphase systems (Noël and Hessel, 2013;Mallia and Baxendale, 2016), improved reaction selectivity and reproducibility (Hartman et al, 2011;Talla et al, 2015;Cambie et al, 2016), simplified or even automated downstream processing (Webb and Jamison, 2010;Pastre et al, 2013;Fabry et al, 2014;Ley et al, 2015;Fabry et al, 2016), increased operational safety (Gutmann et al, 2015;Cambie et al, 2016) and, in the case of photoreactions, a reliable scale-up and an improved irradiation of the reaction mixture (Geyer et al, 2006;Wegner et al, 2011;Su et al, 2014;Su et al, 2016).…”