2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochar catalyzed dechlorination – Which biochar properties matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, for PWBC the 95.84 wt% of the mass was C; 3.92 wt% O; 0.10 wt% S; 0.09 and 0.04 wt% of K and Mg (complete data in Figure S3). This is consistent with results concerning wood based biochar [45][46][47]. At high processing temperature, wood based feedstock may reach a carbon content greater than 95% and oxygen content less than 5% [8].…”
Section: Adsorption Test In Batch Reactorssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, for PWBC the 95.84 wt% of the mass was C; 3.92 wt% O; 0.10 wt% S; 0.09 and 0.04 wt% of K and Mg (complete data in Figure S3). This is consistent with results concerning wood based biochar [45][46][47]. At high processing temperature, wood based feedstock may reach a carbon content greater than 95% and oxygen content less than 5% [8].…”
Section: Adsorption Test In Batch Reactorssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The performance of the BC enriched with Fe was attractive, as more than one removal mechanism may be implicated [34]. Recent papers have described the reduction of organic contaminants on the ZVI/BC magnetic surface [45,[50][51][52]. In contrast, no intermediates of TCE reduction were revealed in the range of concentration investigated in our study.…”
Section: Adsorption Test In Batch Reactorsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Except for the abovementioned dithiothreitol, which gives similar rate constants to the sulfides (Table S1), other reductants that have been mentioned above also achieve high performance under catalysis by carbon materials. Among them, GR should be highlighted because reduction rate constants (k SA ) of tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethylene (TCE) in GR-biochar systems were found to be more than one and two orders of magnitude higher than those in systems using sulfide as a reductant, respectively (Ai et al, 2019;Ai et al, 2020;Ai et al, 2021). GR has also been reported to catalyze the dechlorination of carbon tetrachloride when GO was used as the catalyst (Huang et al, 2017), whereas GR alone has little reactivity towards these halogenated compounds.…”
Section: Performance Of Carbon Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the electrical conductivity and the prevalence of quinone moieties could be balanced through controlling pyrolysis temperature during the production of carbon materials. This method was common for pursuing a higher catalytic activity of carbon materials, and the graphitization degree and oxygen content of carbon materials would increase and drop, respectively, with the increased pyrolysis temperature (Ai et al, 2021).…”
Section: Modification Of Carbon Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general mechanism is to immobilize different classes of pollutants, thanks to the carbon structure and functional groups present on the surface [35,36], resulting in the contaminants being ready for biodegradation [37]. These important effects should also be linked to the electron transfer capacity of biochar, which may be responsible for the degradation of several pollutants [38][39][40][41]. These premises explain why recent studies point to biochar as a possible support for the growth of specific bacterial consortia (as a biofilm carrier [42]) and for enhancing biodegradation of pollutants [25,43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%