1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-3270-1_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemical and EPR Probes for Structure-Function Studies of Iron Sulfur Centers of Succinate Dehydrogenase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the reduction of artificial electron acceptors such as INT only requires the proximal redox centers in SDH, i.e. the FAD (which is reduced by succinate) and S1, the 2Fe/2S center that is reduced by the FADH 2 and that then reduces INT [80]. The second assay for complex II measured the succinate-dependent reduction of ubiquinone which requires electron flow through all of its redox centers, including the FAD, and the S1 (2Fe-2S) and S3 (3Fe4S) centers [77].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the reduction of artificial electron acceptors such as INT only requires the proximal redox centers in SDH, i.e. the FAD (which is reduced by succinate) and S1, the 2Fe/2S center that is reduced by the FADH 2 and that then reduces INT [80]. The second assay for complex II measured the succinate-dependent reduction of ubiquinone which requires electron flow through all of its redox centers, including the FAD, and the S1 (2Fe-2S) and S3 (3Fe4S) centers [77].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced [2Fe-2S] 1+ cluster N1b from complex I has a g ‖ = 2.03 (2.02 in some species) [108], and reduced S1 of complex II has a g z = 2.025 [86]. However, the ratios of the intensities of g = 1.94 (major) to g = 2.02 (minor) for S1 should be constant under different conditions [80]. Since both our temperature and recovery data show that this ratio is not constant, we do not believe that the g = 2.02 signal can be accounted for by a single species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) dehydrogenase (Complex I) was measured as described by King and Howard (1967). Activity of SDH (Complex II) was assayed according to the method of King et al (1976). The activity of cytochrome oxidase (Complex IV) was assayed according to the method described by Sottocasa et al (1967).…”
Section: Estimation Of Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corpus striatum was dissected, rinsed in isotonic saline and mitochondria were isolated by the method described by Stahl et al (1963). Briefly, striatum was homogenized in ice-cold buffer A [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.44 M Sucrose, 10 mM EDTA and 0.1% BSA] and centrifuged at 2100g for 15 min at 4 C. The pellet was discarded and the supernatant was further centrifuged at 14,000g for 15 min at 4 C. The crude mitochondrial pellet was separated and washed with buffer A and again spun at 7000g for 15 min at 4 C. The final mitochondrial pellet was resuspended in buffer B [10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.44 M sucrose] and the purity of mitochondria was checked by measuring activity of succinate dehydrogenase as described by King et al (1976).…”
Section: Preparation Of Subcellular Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%