We have investigated the release of two peptide cotransmitters from the terminals of a cholinergic motor neuron in Aplysia. Identified motor neuron B15 synthesizes the two small cardioactive peptides (SCP) A and B in addition to acetylcholine. A symmetrical pair of B15 neurons innervate symmetrical buccal muscles, termed 15, which are involved in generating biting movements. The amplitude of I5 contractions is enhanced by the SCPs. Intracellular stimulation of one B15 produces depletion of the SCPs from the stimulated muscle as compared to the unstimulated control muscle. Significant depletion requires either high-frequency stimulation or prolonged bursts at lower frequencies. A second cholinergic motor neuron, B16, also innervates I5 but does not synthesize the SCPs. Stimulation of B16 produced no depletion of the SCPs. Exogenous SCPs potently increase cAMP levels in the muscle. If depletion is a reflection of release, it should be possible to demonstrate an effect ofB15 stimulation on muscle cAMP levels. Indeed, stimulation of B15 did elevate cAMP levels in I5. Stimulation of B16 had no effect on cAMP levels. Increases in cAMP were observed only when B15 was stimulated in a manner that would produce significantly facilitated acetylcholine release. This facilitation could be produced by increased stiniulation frequency, longer burst durations, or shorter interburst intervals. However, B15 is capable of producing cholinergically mediated contractions with stimulation parameters that would not cause release of the SCPs. Thus, B15 appears to function as a purely cholinergic motor neuron when firing slowly, and as a cholinergic/peptidergic neuron when firing rapidly.Over the last decade, it has become clear that many neurons contain multiple transmitters, often one or more peptide transmitters with a single conventional transmitter (1, 2). Knowledge of the regulation of release of coexisting transmitters is crucial to our understanding of the physiological roles of each transmitter and the interactions between them (3-5). The metabolism of conventional transmitters and peptide transmitters differs significantly. Conventional transmitters are synthesized enzymatically at synaptic terminals and, once released, usually have high-affinity uptake systems. Thus, there are cellular mechanisms for maintaining homeostatic levels of conventional transmitters. In contrast, peptide transmitters are cleaved from precursors in the neuronal cell body and transported to remote terminals and there is little evidence for efficient reuptake of most peptides. Consequently, during sustained activation, either the rates of peptide release must be very low compared to total content in the terminals or the peptide content must decline.One class of peptides that have been commonly found to coexist with other transmitters in Aplysia neurons are the small cardioactive peptides (SCPs) (6-8). The SCPs are represented by two peptides, SCPA and SCPB, which are 11 and 9 amino acids in length, respectively. These peptides have similar se...