This study aims to investigate the relative contribution of ante-and post-mortem factors to the final quality of beef. In all, 112 steers (four breed-crosses) were arranged in a 2 3 2 3 2 factorial experimental including production system, growth implant and b-adrenergic agonist strategies. Carcasses were suspended by the Achilles tendon or the aitch bone and meat was aged for 2/6/13/21/27 days (longissimus muscle) or 2/27 days (semimembranosus muscle). Meat quality traits related to beef texture were measured. Statistical analyses were developed including ante-and post-mortem factors and their relative contribution to the variability observed for each measured trait was calculated. The main factor responsible for the variability in sarcomere length was the suspension method (91.1%), which also influenced drip-loss (44.3%). Increasing the percentage of British breeds increased (P , 0.05) the intramuscular fat content in longissimus muscle, but only when implants were not used. Thus, the breed-cross, implant strategy and their interaction were responsible for .58% of the variability in this trait. The variability in instrumental and sensory tenderness was mainly affected by post-mortem factors (carcass suspension, ageing time and their interaction), explaining generally , 70% of the variability in these traits. Breed-cross was the second most important effect ( ,15%) when carcass suspension was not considered in the model, but still ageing time was responsible for a much larger proportion of the variability in tenderness (.45%). In conclusion, post-mortem handling of the carcasses may be much more effective in controlling beef tenderness than pre-mortem strategies.Keywords: ageing, b-agonist, carcass suspension, finishing, implant
ImplicationsUnder the conditions simulated in this study, including breed-cross, production system, use of implants and/or b-agonists, carcass suspension and ageing time in a single study has been able to explain more than 70% of the variability in beef tenderness. Therefore, a large amount of the inconsistency in beef tenderness at the consumer level could be controlled by manipulating these factors. Moreover, the large amount of variability already explained and the possibility of quantifying the impact of each factor on the final tenderness opens the door to a new way of approaching beef quality manipulation. Besides the potential use of this information for breeding programs or development of new production systems, understanding the effect and interactions of the different factors present in the production chain is the first step in developing palatability assurance critical control point systems.