1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80006-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biochemistry and regulation of pre-mRNA splicing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
89
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
89
1
Order By: Relevance
“…18,20 On the basis of these various findings, it has been proposed that the choice between intronic and exonic splice sites may be regulated by changes in the relative level of expression of SR proteins and hnRNPs 18,20 with additional specificity being achieved if particular combinations of these antagonistic factors act preferentially on certain pre-mRNA transcripts. 16,17,20,21 Although this model is attractive in its simplicity, in the present study Western blot analysis failed to demonstrate substantial differences in the levels of these two families of splicing factors in T24 and PC3 cells, suggesting that more complex mechanisms operate to determine splice site selection in the context of CD44. Of course, it is quite possible that the functional activity of SR proteins and hnRNPs may differ in the two cell lines and studies are currently underway to determine whether these molecules are differentially phosphorylated or otherwise modified in a cell-specific manner.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…18,20 On the basis of these various findings, it has been proposed that the choice between intronic and exonic splice sites may be regulated by changes in the relative level of expression of SR proteins and hnRNPs 18,20 with additional specificity being achieved if particular combinations of these antagonistic factors act preferentially on certain pre-mRNA transcripts. 16,17,20,21 Although this model is attractive in its simplicity, in the present study Western blot analysis failed to demonstrate substantial differences in the levels of these two families of splicing factors in T24 and PC3 cells, suggesting that more complex mechanisms operate to determine splice site selection in the context of CD44. Of course, it is quite possible that the functional activity of SR proteins and hnRNPs may differ in the two cell lines and studies are currently underway to determine whether these molecules are differentially phosphorylated or otherwise modified in a cell-specific manner.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Attention in this regard has focused on members of a conserved family of ubiquitous and highly expressed RNA-binding proteins known as the SR proteins, so called because of the presence of a characteristic serine-argine-rich carboxy-terminal domain of variable length. 16,17 SR proteins function as an essential component of the constitutive splicing machinery playing a critical role in the early stages of spliceosome assembly. Importantly, they also seem to affect the alternative splicing of many different pre-mRNA transcripts, acting in a concentration-dependent manner and combinatorial pattern to promote the use of proximal alternative 5 0 splice sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alternative splicing of mRNA regulates the production of a number of important biological molecules. Splice-editing of mRNA can regulate gene expression by preventing or promoting translation, or it can produce alternative protein products with disparate functions (Adams et al, 1996). From the number of genes that are now known to be regulated by alternative splicing, it is clear that splicing regulation is an important adjunct to promoter-mediated regulation of gene expression (Rubinfeld et al, 1997;Roberts et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is that the new acceptor site is inherently more efficient than the natural acceptor, but the natural acceptor's proximity to the branch site makes it the preferred location for splicing. The first AG downstream of an intron's branch site is normally selected for exon ligation 36 . Thus, mutation of the native acceptor AG would allow splicing to occur at the next AG downstream, whose context may be better suited for efficient splicing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%