2021
DOI: 10.1111/aor.14149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatibility of an apical ring plug for left ventricular assist device explantation: Results of a feasibility pre‐clinical study

Abstract: Background: Patients receiving left ventricle assist devices (LVADs) as bridge to recovery remain a minority with 1%-5% of LVADs explanted after improvement of myocardial function. Nevertheless, considering the growing population of patients supported with LVADs, an increasing demand of new explantation strategies is expected in the near future. A novel plug for LVAD explantation has been developed and its biocompatibility profile needs to be proved. This study tested the biocompatibility of this novel plug in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If proven, anticoagulation would be only necessary for the early postoperative period, reducing the long-term bleeding risks. Ongoing in-vivo animal studies are currently testing this hypothesis 12 . Studies with longer follow-up can monitor the evolution of the outflow graft status and risk of infection related the graft material and thrombus formation inside the graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If proven, anticoagulation would be only necessary for the early postoperative period, reducing the long-term bleeding risks. Ongoing in-vivo animal studies are currently testing this hypothesis 12 . Studies with longer follow-up can monitor the evolution of the outflow graft status and risk of infection related the graft material and thrombus formation inside the graft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the use of the recovery plug is still off-label, and further studies are needed to evaluate its biocompatibility and the possibility of causing infection. 17 Furthermore, other studies are required to compare the long-term results of both methods, especially regarding the possibility of infection due to retained parts. 18 There has been considerable debate regarding whether anticoagulation should be continued after decommissioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with percutaneous decommissioning, the latter appears to be easier and less demanding. Moreover, the use of the recovery plug is still off‐label, and further studies are needed to evaluate its biocompatibility and the possibility of causing infection 17 . Furthermore, other studies are required to compare the long‐term results of both methods, especially regarding the possibility of infection due to retained parts 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usage of Impella 5.5 implantation is a feasible and safe concept to bridge LVAD patients to cardiac recovery and offers the possibility of LVAD re‐implantation as a bailout option. Alternative concepts for decommissioning the device are the placement of a plug or full LVAD, interventional decommissioning, surgical explantation, and left ventricular reconstruction 3–5 . We refrained from both due to the limited availability of the HVAD plug and to reduce surgical trauma and operating time as well as to avoid the use of the heart‐lung machine.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%