2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00161-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatibility of implantable synthetic polymeric drug carriers: focus on brain biocompatibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
249
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
8
249
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…No evidence of damage was observed on the tissue that surrounds the implanted microparticles indicating that they were well tolerated. Consistent with previous reports, GFAP-positive reactive astrocytes were observed around the needle tract ( Figure 6A) [14,16,24]. This reaction was the same for the 3 groups of animals demonstrating that the astrocytic response is attributed to the mechanical trauma that occurs during surgery and not to the polymer.…”
Section: Histological Effects Of Striatal Gdnf Microparticle Implantasupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No evidence of damage was observed on the tissue that surrounds the implanted microparticles indicating that they were well tolerated. Consistent with previous reports, GFAP-positive reactive astrocytes were observed around the needle tract ( Figure 6A) [14,16,24]. This reaction was the same for the 3 groups of animals demonstrating that the astrocytic response is attributed to the mechanical trauma that occurs during surgery and not to the polymer.…”
Section: Histological Effects Of Striatal Gdnf Microparticle Implantasupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First of all, microparticles are prepared with biodegradable polymers that do not require removal once the treatment is finished. Secondly, brain biocompatibility of particles prepared with poly (lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) polymers has already been well established [13][14][15][16] and therefore the appearance of host immune reaction against injected microparticles is very unlikely. Finally, the drug release profile of PLGA microspheres brings another important advantage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymers derived from D,L lactic and glycolic acids, poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), are biocompatible and biodegradable (Visscher et al, 1985;Fournier et al, 2003), they have been widely employed with this aim in mind. Drug release from these systems is due to drug diffusion through water-filled networks of pores and channels coupled with the bulk erosion of the microspheres by hydrolysis of the polymer's ester bond linkages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 However, many of these medical devices fail to produce long term therapeutic effect raising serious concerns over the efficiency of these implants. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] For example, the chemotherapeutic doxorubicin delivering millirods has been reported to lose efficacy 8 days post subcutaneous implantation. 8 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent evidences have supported that dense avascular fibrotic tissues serve as diffusion barrier for the released drugs to enter into circulation and for blood components and nutrition from the tissue fluid to interact with implanted sensor. 11,[18][19][20] The enormity of this complication is underlined by previous studies which have found that even low molecular weight substances cannot cross the barrier. [21][22][23][24] Therefore, it is generally accepted that, by reducing implant-mediated fibrotic tissue, the life span, function, and efficacy of drug releasing devices, sensors, and tissue engineering scaffolds could be substantially improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%