1992
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90021-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatibility of retrograde filling materials in the ferret canine Amalgam and IRM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 These results reflected the type of biomaterial connective tissue interface obtained with these materials in vivo where a fibrous encapsulation or chronic inflammatory response rather than the formation of a periodontal connective tissue attachment has been reported. [22][23][24] However, the optimal result after periodontal wound healing is the regeneration of a periodontal connective tissue attachment. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine whether the application of EMD, a preparation thought to be inductive of cementum formation, would alter the phenotype of PDL cells when cultured on materials that have not been reported to support periodontal connective tissue attachment in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 These results reflected the type of biomaterial connective tissue interface obtained with these materials in vivo where a fibrous encapsulation or chronic inflammatory response rather than the formation of a periodontal connective tissue attachment has been reported. [22][23][24] However, the optimal result after periodontal wound healing is the regeneration of a periodontal connective tissue attachment. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to determine whether the application of EMD, a preparation thought to be inductive of cementum formation, would alter the phenotype of PDL cells when cultured on materials that have not been reported to support periodontal connective tissue attachment in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Primary periodontal ligament cells similarly cultured on amalgam, calcium hydroxide, or gutta percha, did not express the cementum-associated extracellular matrix protein, 21 results that reflect the response to these materials in vivo. 6,7 However, in a companion article, we report that EMD applied to gutta percha or calcium hydroxide permitted the expression of the cementum extracellular matrix protein by primary periodontal ligament cells after 7 days of culture. 22 These results suggest that the application of EMD can alter the phenotype of periodontal ligament cells when cultured on these materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Rather, a fibrous encapsulation or a chronic inflammatory response has been reported at the periodontal connective tissue material interface with these materials. 6,7 Because the periodontal ligament contains pluripotental cell populations, it may be possible to increase the clinical success rate of procedures using these materials if one were able to induce…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Data were expressed in number; Statistical analysis was done by Chi-square test was performed to compare between groups; n = Number of subject incidence of pain by MTA or IRM may be due inadequacy of the repair, 15 or extrusion of the material into the furcal area. 2 Furthermore, it is reported that IRM causes persistent inflammation and slower healing potential, 16 and it is more cytotoxic than the MTA. 17 It might be the possible reason for higher incidence of pain in IRM treated teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%