2001
DOI: 10.1053/jcan.2001.26525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatibility of trillium biopassive surface–coated oxygenator versus uncoated oxygenator during cardiopulmonary bypass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15,16 Our results showed better results in IL-6 and C3a levels and weak superiority in WBC and platelet counts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…15,16 Our results showed better results in IL-6 and C3a levels and weak superiority in WBC and platelet counts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This is also in agreement with earlier studies. 31,35 The differences were not significant, even if the median concentrations were higher in the Trillium group. Due to the small Comparison of a bypass circuit and an oxygenator during surgery TN Hoel et al…”
Section: Coagulation and Fibrinolysismentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This is in agreement with some previous reports. 31,35 Plasmin formation, giving evidence of fibrinolytic activity and representing a marker for activation of the coagulation, showed a steady increase in both groups. This is also in agreement with earlier studies.…”
Section: Coagulation and Fibrinolysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, they limit coagulation at the artificial surface, at surgical sites, and within native blood vessels. The result is longer device lifespan but also increased risk of bleeding complications [35]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%