1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02561616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocompatibility testing of a new silver-impregnated catheterin vivo

Abstract: The purpose of this investigation was to compare the local effects of polyurethane (Tecothane) and silicone tubes with or without silver impregnation in rats. Bacterial colonization or infection of the exit site and/or tunnel were documented and interpreted. All tubes were placed subcutaneously or percutaneously in the neck of 41 Sprague-Dawley rats and guided beneath the dorsal muscles into the peritoneal cavity. The incidence of bacterial abscesses along the implanted tubes was evaluated daily. After 90 days… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antimicrobial activity of silver is based on the release of silver ions which is an ion-exchange process [14,15]. Some studies have confirmed that the main drawback of silver is that during long term use if the released ions reach a certain concentration, silver could cause toxicity in both human and animal cells [16,17]. Impregnation of silver ions into the surface is a safer way to ensure antibacterial properties of the material since the silver concentration is lower in this case, and the release is governed by the diffusion of the ion from the top surface layers of the material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The antimicrobial activity of silver is based on the release of silver ions which is an ion-exchange process [14,15]. Some studies have confirmed that the main drawback of silver is that during long term use if the released ions reach a certain concentration, silver could cause toxicity in both human and animal cells [16,17]. Impregnation of silver ions into the surface is a safer way to ensure antibacterial properties of the material since the silver concentration is lower in this case, and the release is governed by the diffusion of the ion from the top surface layers of the material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impregnation of silver ions into the surface is a safer way to ensure antibacterial properties of the material since the silver concentration is lower in this case, and the release is governed by the diffusion of the ion from the top surface layers of the material. For this application silver-sulfadiazine or other silver compounds are usually used [16][17][18]. Clinical studies have, however, proved that the antibacterial activity of silversulfadiazine impregnated catheters decreased rapidly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By increasing the silver ion concentration the antimicrobial activity can be increased, however, a certain concentration in the human environment (10mg/L , (Schierholz et al, 1998)) is cytotoxic and may lead to argyria. The antimicrobial efficiency and the performance of antibiotics and silver treated catheters against CAI have been compared in several studies (Böswald et al, 1999, Lyu and Untereker, 2009, Paterson et al, 1999, Walder et al, 2002. The most commonly used antibiotics for treatment of the catheters are minocycline-rifampin, piperacillin, gentamicin, and ofloxacin.…”
Section: Current Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies showed that use ofmonociclyne-rifampin, ofloxacim and chlorohexidine-silver-sulfadiazine resulted in the least number of CAI compared to the other agents. Silver sulfadiazine expressed a high degree of biocompatibility and applicability in human environment (Böswald et al, 1999, Paterson et al, 1999, however, monocycline-rifampin showed better antiseptic properties. The antibacterial mechanism of silver-sulfadiazine is not completely understood.…”
Section: Current Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antimicrobial activity of silver has been confirmed on a wide range of organisms, including bacteria, viruses and fungi (Russel and Hugo 1994;Damm et al 2005). Simultaneously, concerns about the environmental impact of silver ions and particles have been growing in recent years, as expressed in literature (Böswald et al 1999;Venous 1999;Kim et al 2009;MarambioJones and Hoek 2010;Echegoyen and Nerín 2013;Cushen et al 2014). The content of silver in everyday goods, and thus also in packaging, is not currently regulated either in the European Union or in the United States of America (Seaton et al 2010;LangauerLewowicka and Pawlas 2015;Mackevica et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%