2012
DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2012.658552
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocontrol activity of salt tolerantStreptomycesisolates against phytopathogens causing root rot of sugar beet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sodium chloride test showed that two active isolates of Streptomyces sp. were tolerant in salt environments; this result is similar to Karimi et al (2012) and Jignasha et al (2010). According to the study on the salty soils of Kerman province, these isolates can successfully control the Fusarium spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Sodium chloride test showed that two active isolates of Streptomyces sp. were tolerant in salt environments; this result is similar to Karimi et al (2012) and Jignasha et al (2010). According to the study on the salty soils of Kerman province, these isolates can successfully control the Fusarium spp.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Streptomycetes are Gram positive, filamentous bacteria that are excellent saprophytes, prolific producers of extracellular enzymes and ubiquitous in soil and marine sediments (Gontang et al, 2007;Chater et al, 2010). Streptomycetes are the source of many clinically significant antibiotics and have been investigated in agricultural settings for their capacities to suppress plant pathogens (Bressan and Figueiredo, 2007;Hiltunen et al, 2009;Karimi et al, 2012;Kinkel et al, 2012;Meschke et al, 2012;Otto-Hanson et al, 2013). Because of their capabilities at producing bioactive compounds and in response to the tremendous therapeutic value of many of these compounds, antibiotic production in Streptomycetes has been studied extensively in vitro.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although growth inhibition is a common method of evaluating inhibition in many in vitro assays (1,2,9,24,32,34,40), this dependent variable was greatly influenced by differences in growth rate among Pythium isolates (η 2 = 0.51 to 0.56) compared to inhibition zone distance (η 2 = 0.11). Although growth inhibition is a common method of evaluating inhibition in many in vitro assays (1,2,9,24,32,34,40), this dependent variable was greatly influenced by differences in growth rate among Pythium isolates (η 2 = 0.51 to 0.56) compared to inhibition zone distance (η 2 = 0.11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3,4,8,9,23,24,29,35,37,48,50). have been used as BCAs against a number of soilborne pathogens, including phytopathogenic Pythium spp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%