2008
DOI: 10.2137/145960607781635877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocontrol of postharvest decay using a new strain of Pseudomonas syringae CPA-5 in different cultivars of pome fruits

Abstract: Epiphytic micro-organisms isolated from fruits and leaves surfaces of apples from different orchards were screened for antagonistic activity against Penicillium expansum. From all micro-organisms tested the new strain CPA-5 of Pseudomonas syringae, isolated from organic orchard, was selected. This strain was very effective against Botrytis cinerea, P. expansum and Rhizopus stolonifer at various antagonist and pathogen concentrations on 'Golden Delicious' apple, and 'Blanquilla', 'Rocha' and 'Conference' pear. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biological control, using microorganisms antagonistic to the fungal plant pathogens, has gained considerable attention and appears to be promising as a viable supplement or alternative to chemical control (Spadaro and Gullino 2004;Nunes et al 2009). A whole range of living organisms has been proposed as potential biocontrol agents, on pome fruits (Viñas et al 1998;Nunes et al 2001;Torres et al 2005;Mounir et al 2007;Nunes et al 2007), stone fruit (Pusey and Wilson 1984;Bonaterra et al 2003), grapes, cherries (Kurtzman and Droby 2001;Schena et al 2003) and citrus fruits (Chalutz and Wilson 1990;Smilanick and Denis-Arrue 1992). However, the success and widespread use of biofungicides, remains limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological control, using microorganisms antagonistic to the fungal plant pathogens, has gained considerable attention and appears to be promising as a viable supplement or alternative to chemical control (Spadaro and Gullino 2004;Nunes et al 2009). A whole range of living organisms has been proposed as potential biocontrol agents, on pome fruits (Viñas et al 1998;Nunes et al 2001;Torres et al 2005;Mounir et al 2007;Nunes et al 2007), stone fruit (Pusey and Wilson 1984;Bonaterra et al 2003), grapes, cherries (Kurtzman and Droby 2001;Schena et al 2003) and citrus fruits (Chalutz and Wilson 1990;Smilanick and Denis-Arrue 1992). However, the success and widespread use of biofungicides, remains limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on different morphologies and color, colonies were selected and further isolated. Eighteen postharvest fungal antagonists: CPA-1 (Candida sake, Viñas et al, 1998), CPA-2 (Pantoea agglomerans, Nunes et al, 2001), CPA-3 (Pantoea ananatis, Torres et al, 2005), CPA-5 (Pseudomonas syringae, Nunes et al, 2007), CPA-7 (Pseudomonas graminis, Alegre et al, 2013b) and EL 8, PN5, PN6, 128-M, C-9P-21, F-13, F-10, PO, C-9 17, P-12, C-5 10, C-10 5, and RG4 strains (unpublished results); belonging to the Pathology Laboratory collection (IRTA, Lleida), was also tested.…”
Section: Isolation Of Putative Antagonistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the rhizosphere will be the scenario here considered to review biocontrol Pseudomonas spp. Nevertheless, specific pseudomonads strains have also shown to be effective in the biocontrol of postharvest and fruit trees disease (see, for instance, Nunes et al 2007;Bonaterra et al 2012) although they will not be treated in this chapter.…”
Section: Beneficial Pseudomonas Sppmentioning
confidence: 99%