2021
DOI: 10.2478/johh-2021-0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biocrust effects on soil infiltrability in the Mu Us Desert: Soil hydraulic properties analysis and modeling

Abstract: The presence of biocrusts changes water infiltration in the Mu Us Desert. Knowledge of the hydraulic properties of biocrusts and parameterization of soil hydraulic properties are important to improve simulation of infiltration and soil water dynamics in vegetation-soil-water models. In this study, four treatments, including bare land with sporadic cyanobacterial biocrusts (BL), lichen-dominated biocrusts (LB), early-successional moss biocrusts (EMB), and late-successional moss biocrusts (LMB), were established… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reinforce the idea that biocrusts limit the infiltration of water to greater depths in sandy soils, and that their infiltration-reducing effect increases with biocrust successional stage ( Warren, 2003 ; Bowker et al, 2008 ). All three investigated infiltration parameters of the studied Caatinga biocrusts were within the lower range reported for cyanobacteria-dominated biocrusts on sandy soils ( Drahorad et al, 2013 ; Lichner et al, 2018 ; Guan and Liu, 2021 ). Water infiltration was consequently strongly reduced by sorptivity and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, but only moderately by water repellency (with repellency index values in biocrusts in literature ranging from 1.9 to 210; cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reinforce the idea that biocrusts limit the infiltration of water to greater depths in sandy soils, and that their infiltration-reducing effect increases with biocrust successional stage ( Warren, 2003 ; Bowker et al, 2008 ). All three investigated infiltration parameters of the studied Caatinga biocrusts were within the lower range reported for cyanobacteria-dominated biocrusts on sandy soils ( Drahorad et al, 2013 ; Lichner et al, 2018 ; Guan and Liu, 2021 ). Water infiltration was consequently strongly reduced by sorptivity and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, but only moderately by water repellency (with repellency index values in biocrusts in literature ranging from 1.9 to 210; cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Frontiers in Microbiology 09 frontiersin.org 2003; Bowker et al, 2008). All three investigated infiltration parameters of the studied Caatinga biocrusts were within the lower range reported for cyanobacteria-dominated biocrusts on sandy soils Lichner et al, 2018;Guan and Liu, 2021).…”
Section: A B Figuresupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In the Mu Us desert in China, both lichen and moss-covered biocrusts reduced the infiltration rates compared with bare soil; however, water retention on moss-covered soils was higher than on lichen-covered soils (Guan and Liu, 2021).…”
Section: Seasonal Thermal Effect By Biocrustsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This knowledge gap is concerning, considering the potential important role of biocrusts covering interplant spaces in regulating water fluxes and soil water content (Chamizo et al, 2013). A recent study indicated that biocrusts significantly regulate local soil hydraulic properties in desert steppe ecosystems, with the specific impact varying depending on the type of biocrust present (Guan & Liu, 2021). However, the ecohydrological influences of biocrusts and their pathways in desert steppe ecosystems remain poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%