1984
DOI: 10.1016/0147-6513(84)90063-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodegradability test results related to quality and quantity of the inoculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons it is reasonable to propose that some type of standardized protocol be used to prepare the inocula for biodegradation tests so that the test results would be reproducible and data from various laboratories could readily be compared (Blok and Booy, 1984;Struijs et al, 1995). The MITI Biodegradation Test Guidelines (OECD, 1993) as well as several other published protocols (Tabka et al, 1993) attempt to achieve this aim.…”
Section: Diwerences Among the Microbial Communities Of Activated Sludgementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For these reasons it is reasonable to propose that some type of standardized protocol be used to prepare the inocula for biodegradation tests so that the test results would be reproducible and data from various laboratories could readily be compared (Blok and Booy, 1984;Struijs et al, 1995). The MITI Biodegradation Test Guidelines (OECD, 1993) as well as several other published protocols (Tabka et al, 1993) attempt to achieve this aim.…”
Section: Diwerences Among the Microbial Communities Of Activated Sludgementioning
confidence: 98%
“…These results can be compared to direct estimates based on analysis of the exponential part of the observed rate of mineralization (Blok and Struijs, 1996). Blok and Booy (1984) present examples of delayed adaptation times for diethyleneglycol and anthraquinone. A difference of dilution by a factor 10 3 to 10 4 for the same inoculum of activated sludge caused a delay of 14 days for ethylene glycol.…”
Section: Results and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(1) the Note. 1, 1 laboratory, 29 substances Fisher, 1979, 1981); 2, 24-69 laboratories, 6 substances in OECD ring test 1979-1980(Blok and Booy, 1984; 3, 15-41 laboratories, diethyleneglycol in OECD ring test 1978-1979(Blok and Booy, 19844, 15-40 laboratories, 4-nitrophenol in OECD ring test 1978-1979(Block and Booy, 1984; 5, one laboratory, 31 substances (Kitano and Takatsuki, 1988;Painter, 1992). adaptation time follows from ðT adapt Þ plant ¼ fln ð1:39 Â 10 8 Þ=ð0:2 Â 10 6 Þg=" n and gives 4, 12, or 48 days, respectively, for the different maximum growth rates assumed.…”
Section: (5) Explanation Of Poor Reproducibility Between Results Of Dmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, the milligrams of substrate carbon removed per milligram of dry inoculum solids per hour, has been proposed. 25 Although the kinetics of the increase in biomass has been used as an indirect measure of biodegradation, 26 it is of limited value because of the variation of the yield coefficient with substrates and the nature of inoculum. 27 The rate coefficients listed in Table I show about the same degree of biodegradability for most samples (k ϭ 0.14 to 0.18 days…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%