2020
DOI: 10.1002/pat.4824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodegradable and antibacterial poly(azomethine‐urethane)‐chitosan hydrogels for potential drug delivery application

Abstract: In this study, biodegradable and antibacterial poly(azomethine‐urethane) (PAMU)‐ and chitosan (CS)‐based hydrogels have been prepared for controlled drug delivery applications. Structural and morphological characterizations of the hydrogels were performed via Fourier transform‐infrared and scanning electron microscopy analyses. Thermal stability, hydrophilicity, swelling, mechanical, biodegradation, protein absorption properties, and drug delivery application of PAMU‐ and CS‐based hydrogels were also investiga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the drug release performance of the hydrogels, a certain amount of the drug‐loaded PU and CS‐based hydrogels was immersed into the freshly prepared PBS (0.01 M, pH 7.4). At certain time intervals, 3 ml of drug containing the solution was removed from the mixture medium and the drug concentration was calculated using the following Equation (4) with a spectrophotometer at 267 nm 26 %Cumulative release0.25em()CRgoodbreak=CnV+in1CiVim where V and V i are the volumes of 5‐FU in release medium (20 ml) and removed 5‐FU (3 ml), C n and C i are drug concentrations at the initial state (0.5 mg ml −1 ), and in release medium, and m is mass of the hydrogels (mg), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the drug release performance of the hydrogels, a certain amount of the drug‐loaded PU and CS‐based hydrogels was immersed into the freshly prepared PBS (0.01 M, pH 7.4). At certain time intervals, 3 ml of drug containing the solution was removed from the mixture medium and the drug concentration was calculated using the following Equation (4) with a spectrophotometer at 267 nm 26 %Cumulative release0.25em()CRgoodbreak=CnV+in1CiVim where V and V i are the volumes of 5‐FU in release medium (20 ml) and removed 5‐FU (3 ml), C n and C i are drug concentrations at the initial state (0.5 mg ml −1 ), and in release medium, and m is mass of the hydrogels (mg), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, systemic medication presents many disadvantages such as severe side effects, low effective drug concentration, and frequent administration. Drug carriers for local delivery have been developed during the past decades as alternative to systemic medication, including hydrogels, polymeric films, rods, and fiber scaffold, and so on 5–8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different strategies are available for in situ hydrogel preparation, including stimuli‐responsiveness, Schiff base reaction, hydrophobic interaction, and three‐dimensional complexation. Stimuli‐responsive hydrogels are obtained from materials, which can respond to various stimuli such light, ions, chemicals and temperature to trigger covalent or physical crosslinking 5,11 . Among them, photo‐crosslinked hydrogels have been widely used in the biomedical field, such as drug delivery and cancer therapy, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, biosensing, and so on, due to their temporal and spatial controllability 12–14 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations