2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-2361(01)00142-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biodesulphurization of coal: behaviour of trace elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Demir et al examined the effect of froth flotation on the removal of the trace element(s) content from coal. Morán et al found that some pro-sulfur elements, such as Ni, Cu, Zn, As, among others, can be partly removed by the biological desulfurization process. Helble investigated the effects of coal separation on the reduction of emissions of trace elements during coal combustion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demir et al examined the effect of froth flotation on the removal of the trace element(s) content from coal. Morán et al found that some pro-sulfur elements, such as Ni, Cu, Zn, As, among others, can be partly removed by the biological desulfurization process. Helble investigated the effects of coal separation on the reduction of emissions of trace elements during coal combustion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different techniques of desulfurization have been developed based on physical, microbial, and chemical principles, but the former two methods are ineffective in removing sulfur completely. Chemical methods are promising desulfurization processes, are used extensively worldwide, and primarily utilize different oxidizing agents as desulfurizing reagents. Although chemical processes can successfully remove almost the entire inorganic sulfur component of coal, removal of organic sulfur is achieved to a certain extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various physical, microbial, and chemical methods of desulfurization are known; however, the former two are ineffective in leaching organic sulfur to the permissible level from coal. In contrast, chemical methods are promising desulfurization processes and are usually accomplished using various oxidizing agents. Almost all the sulfate and pyritic sulfur can effectively be removed by chemical methods; however, in the case of organic sulfur, removal is achieved to a reasonable extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%